Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Litomyšl

IČO 00276944

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sociální bydlení v Litomyšli
Construction work
8
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy domu č. p. 534 včetně nových zpevněných ploch a sjezdu na místní komunikaci
Construction work
5
Ø3 in industry
Navýšení kapacit II. MŠ v Litomyšli
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce strojovny zimního stadionu v Litomyšli za účelem snížení množství chladiva R 717
Heat-exchange units, air-conditioning and refrigerating equipment, and filtering machinery
3
Ø2 in industry
Odborné učebny ZŠ Litomyšl, U Školek
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební sdružení Boštík s.r.o.
5 19,693,948
Kurštejn stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
1 13,280,422
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
1 12,876,970
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
4 12,710,017
Skanska a.s.
2 12,609,004
Other suppliers 32 67,555,304

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

32%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 53,830,799
Small scale tenders 47,557,276
Unregulated purchases 885,264,301
Total 986,652,375

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 25% (4 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

52%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 16 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 7 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 4 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 2 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 13 zakázek