Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Sokolov

IČO 00259586

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Stavební úpravy komunikace Vítězná“
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
6
Ø7 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikace ul. Spartakiádní, Sokolov
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø7 in industry
Revitalizace sportovišť a volnočasových aktivit – stavební práce
Construction work
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Antonínských mostů - Sokolov - SO 201 most přes železniční trať
Construction work for bridges
10
Ø8 in industry
„REVITALIZACE FOTBALOVÉHO STADIONU SOKOLOV – I. ETAPA“
Construction work for sports facilities
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
2 82,617,994
Amper Market, a.s.
2 70,945,842
PHILIPP SPORTOVNÍ TRÁVNÍKY a.s.
2 19,594,375
ROBSTAV stavby k.s.
1 13,535,454
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 11,765,949
Other suppliers 15 51,903,078

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 71%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 614,311,711
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,014,000,758
Total 1,628,312,469

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

15%
average 87%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders