Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Čelákovice

IČO 00240117

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„DOSTAVBA ZÁKLADNÍ ŠKOLY V KOSTELNÍ ULICI V ČELÁKOVICÍCH“
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba parkovacího domu ve městě Čelákovice
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
10
Ø4 in industry
Čelákovice – Záluží, vodovodní přivaděč, kanalizační stoka
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Nové sportovní hřiště u ZŠ Čelákovice, J.A.Komenského 414, p.o. - opakované zadání II.
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSG Construction a.s.
3 95,561,764
Trigema Building a.s.
1 73,506,300
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
3 43,153,701
Horák - stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o.
2 37,847,107
ZEPRIS s.r.o.
3 28,306,509
Other suppliers 30 441,559,038

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

29%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 19)
Nonprice competition 11% (4 from 38)
Division into lots 18% (7 from 38)
E-auction 0% (0 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 453,508,359
Small scale tenders 4,513,287
Unregulated purchases 595,859,664
Total 1,053,881,310

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice
Contract modification
33,894,703 12,542,021 (+38%)
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice
Additional works
- 7,800,729
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice
Additional works
- 1,458,269
Komunikace včetně odvodnění, městská část Jiřina, k.ú. Čelákovice
Contract modification
14,973,648 953,244 (+7%)
Čelákovice - Jiřina - Obnova VHI 3. etapa
Contract modification
6,257,133 399,911 (+7%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

51%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50
Average decision length 75.71 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 40)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 40)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 40)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 40)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 40)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 40)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

21%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.