Buyer profile has high number of errors. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
„DOSTAVBA ZÁKLADNÍ ŠKOLY V KOSTELNÍ ULICI V ČELÁKOVICÍCH“
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Výstavba parkovacího domu ve městě Čelákovice
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
10
Ø4 in industry |
|
Čelákovice – Záluží, vodovodní přivaděč, kanalizační stoka
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nové sportovní hřiště u ZŠ Čelákovice, J.A.Komenského 414, p.o. - opakované zadání II.
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
PSG Construction a.s. |
3 | 95,561,764 |
|
Trigema Building a.s. |
1 | 73,506,300 |
|
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s. |
3 | 43,153,701 |
|
Horák - stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o. |
2 | 37,847,107 |
|
ZEPRIS s.r.o. |
3 | 28,306,509 |
| Other suppliers | 30 | 441,559,038 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
PSG Construction a.s. |
3 | 95,561,764 |
|
Trigema Building a.s. |
1 | 73,506,300 |
|
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s. |
3 | 43,153,701 |
|
Horák - stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o. |
2 | 37,847,107 |
|
ZEPRIS s.r.o. |
3 | 28,306,509 |
|
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o. |
1 | 27,915,713 |
|
1. SčV, a.s. |
2 | 23,284,159 |
|
STAVEBNÍ FIRMA NEUMANN s.r.o. |
2 | 22,972,317 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 18,972,575 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 16,474,300 |
|
Polabská stavební CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 15,471,233 |
|
ARCUS-Růžička, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 11,632,197 |
|
Aulický Invest s.r.o. |
2 | 11,519,778 |
|
Caleum a.s. |
3 | 9,394,000 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST GUTTENBERG s.r.o. |
1 | 7,976,806 |
|
INTERDEKOR HP s.r.o. |
2 | 7,777,574 |
|
Mystic constructions spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,217,300 |
|
THT Polička, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,649,000 |
|
ŘEZANINA & BARTOŇ, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,500,000 |
|
Compo Elektro s.r.o. |
1 | 5,393,779 |
|
Linhart spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,899,949 |
|
HTS Jirny s.r.o. |
1 | 3,305,785 |
|
Compo Praha Interiéry s.r.o. |
1 | 2,519,317 |
|
Ateliér Velehradský, s. r. o. |
1 | 2,400,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Nonprice competition | 11% (4 from 38) |
| Division into lots | 18% (7 from 38) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 38) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 453,508,359 |
| Small scale tenders | 4,513,287 |
| Unregulated purchases | 595,859,664 |
| Total | 1,053,881,310 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 739,681,639 |
| Material consumption | 14,627,307 |
| Energy consumption | 6,834,209 |
| Other consumption | 1,048,333 |
| Sold goods | 45,117 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 133,124,722 |
| Travel costs | 793,468 |
| Representation costs | 1,949,711 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 139,327,942 |
| Small long-term property costs | 10,647,823 |
| Other costs | 5,801,038 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Contract modification |
33,894,703 | 12,542,021 (+38%) |
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Additional works |
- | 7,800,729 |
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Additional works |
- | 1,458,269 |
|
Komunikace včetně odvodnění, městská část Jiřina, k.ú. Čelákovice Contract modification |
14,973,648 | 953,244 (+7%) |
|
Čelákovice - Jiřina - Obnova VHI 3. etapa Contract modification |
6,257,133 | 399,911 (+7%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Contract modification |
33,894,703 | 12,542,021 (+38%) |
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Additional works |
- | 7,800,729 |
|
Splašková kanalizace v městské části Záluží, Čelákovice Additional works |
- | 1,458,269 |
|
Komunikace včetně odvodnění, městská část Jiřina, k.ú. Čelákovice Contract modification |
14,973,648 | 953,244 (+7%) |
|
Čelákovice - Jiřina - Obnova VHI 3. etapa Contract modification |
6,257,133 | 399,911 (+7%) |
|
Oprava a modernizace lodžií bytového domu, Stankovského 1581, Čelákovice Contract modification |
5,591,494 | 175,186 (+4%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 28% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.50 |
| Average decision length | 75.71 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Missing call for tenders | 2% (1 from 40) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Contract | Type of discrepancy |
|---|---|
| REKONSTRUKCE HALY BIOS ČELÁKOVICE | Missing call for tenders |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 82% (zakázek z 38 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.63 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
