Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Valašské Klobouky

IČO 00284611

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Dům na rohu
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
Ø5 in industry
ZTV Dlouhá Valašské Klobouky
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Valašské Klobouky _ regenerace panelového sídliště _ ulice Luční
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Odborné učebny v ZŠ Valašské Klobouky - Stavba
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Do školy? Bezpečně a rychle
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DRGA stavební společnost s.r.o.
1 21,380,579
EFIOS stavební s.r.o.
1 19,103,276
TM Stav, spol. s r.o.
1 13,817,767
3 10,027,625
Martin Urban
1 8,350,569
Other suppliers 23 105,704,786

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 9)
Division into lots 11% (1 from 9)
E-auction 0% (0 from 9)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 9)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 121,426,367
Small scale tenders 32,823,717
Unregulated purchases 232,014,685
Total 386,264,770

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dům na rohu
Contract modification
21,380,579 1,494,225 (+7%)
ZTV Dlouhá Valašské Klobouky
Contract modification
19,103,276 933,281 (+5%)
Do školy? Bezpečně a rychle
Contract modification
8,350,569 1 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.11 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.