Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Valašské Klobouky

IČO 00284611

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex
Show average values  
51%
Bidder participation
98%
Winner concentration
11%
Pro-competitive tools
63%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
89%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
69%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Dům na rohu
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
5
Ø5 in industry
ZTV Dlouhá Valašské Klobouky
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Valašské Klobouky _ regenerace panelového sídliště _ ulice Luční
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Odborné učebny v ZŠ Valašské Klobouky - Stavba
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Do školy? Bezpečně a rychle
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DRGA stavební společnost s.r.o.
 1 21,380,579
EFIOS stavební s.r.o.
 1 19,103,276
TM Stav, spol. s r.o.
 1 13,817,767
ALSPO ZLÍN s.r.o.
 3 10,027,625
Martin Urban
 1 8,350,569
Other suppliers 23 105,704,786

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

11%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 9)
Division into lots 11% (1 from 9)
E-auction 0% (0 from 9)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 9)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 121,426,367
Small scale tenders 32,823,717
Unregulated purchases 232,014,685
Total 386,264,770

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dům na rohu
Contract modification 		21,380,579 1,494,225 (+7%)
ZTV Dlouhá Valašské Klobouky
Contract modification 		19,103,276 933,281 (+5%)
Do školy? Bezpečně a rychle
Contract modification 		8,350,569 1 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.11 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.