Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Velká Bíteš

IČO 00295647

The competition for contracts is high. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zkapacitnění objektu MŠ Velká Bíteš - Masarykovo náměstí 86
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
13
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky JSDH Velká Bíteš
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka dopravního automobilu pro jednotku SDH Velká Bíteš
Specialist vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry
Revitalizace ZŠ Tišnovská 115, Velká Bíteš - vybavení nábytkem a pomůckami
School furniture
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 33,857,105
THT Polička, s.r.o.
2 9,412,700
KOVO, výrobní družstvo
1 1,322,890

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 184,499,830
Small scale tenders 1,396,800
Unregulated purchases 347,141,535
Total 533,038,165

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

63%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zkapacitnění objektu MŠ Velká Bíteš - Masarykovo náměstí 86
Contract modification
33,857,105 4,864,687 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 4)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 4)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 4)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.75 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 4 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.