Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Velká Bíteš

IČO 00295647

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace ZŠ Tišnovská 115, Velká Bíteš
Construction work for school buildings
3
Ø3 in industry
„Inženýrské sítě na Babinci – 2. etapa“
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
4
Ø4 in industry
„Inženýrské sítě na Babinci – 1. etapa“
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
2
Ø4 in industry
Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky JSDH Velká Bíteš
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry
Revitalizace ZŠ Tišnovská 115, Velká Bíteš – konektivita, vybavení PC a AVT
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

0%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IMOS Brno, a.s.
3 139,907,135
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,770,000
FLAME System s.r.o.
1 1,396,800
KOVO, výrobní družstvo
1 1,322,890

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

17%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 17% (1 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 141,230,025
Small scale tenders 1,396,800
Unregulated purchases 376,965,406
Total 519,592,231

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace ZŠ Tišnovská 115, Velká Bíteš
Contract modification
85,948,641 8,264,354 (+10%)
„Inženýrské sítě na Babinci – 1. etapa“
Contract modification
24,971,247 1,017,925 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

23%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender