State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Čeps, a.s.

IČO 25702556

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is high.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
V413/416 - smyčka HBM
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø2 in industry
PRN – rozšíření a rekonstrukce (P.0452), stavebně - montážní práce
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
6
Ø2 in industry
NZ - PRN – rozšíření a rekonstrukce (P.0452), stavebně - montážní práce
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
6
Ø2 in industry
V490/491 – vedení 400 kV PRE - VIT (P.0390), stavebně-montážní práce - V490/491 – vedení 400 kV PRE - VIT (P.0390), stavebně-montážní práce - 1.etapa (TR Vítkov – st. č. 99)
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
4
Ø2 in industry
V490/491 – vedení 400 kV PRE - VIT (P.0390), stavebně-montážní práce - V490/491 – vedení 400 kV PRE - VIT (P.0390), stavebně-montážní práce - 2. etapa (st. č. 99 – st. č. 208)
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ASE, s.r.o.
9 3,374,148,423
EGEM s.r.o.
10 2,722,048,333
OMEXOM GA Energo s.r.o.
11 1,905,929,951
ELEKTROTRANS a.s.
8 1,876,631,667
MITAŞ ENERGY AND METAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
4 1,367,502,658
Other suppliers 73 7,998,315,629

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

63%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (1 from 8)
Nonprice competition 8% (5 from 65)
Division into lots 20% (13 from 65)
E-auction and DPS 45% (29 from 65)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 65)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
PRN – rozšíření a rekonstrukce (P.0452), stavebně montážní - práce
Contract modification
1,056,258,925 38,095,274 (+4%)
Upgrade ŘS TDC Siemens
Authorship rights
- 37,867,331
Rozšíření ŘS společnosti ABB o Cyber Security of Control System, servis a technická podpora zařízení kybernetické bezpečnosti řídicích systémů společnosti ABB
Authorship rights
- 28,110,866
Vedení 400 kV V406/407-Nové dvojité vedení Kočín-Mírovka,zhotovení projektové dok.,výkon funkce GP, Dodatek č. 3
Contract modification
89,920,000 22,976,940 (+26%)
VIT-nová rozvodna 420 kV, stavebně-montážní práce, Dodatek č. 2
Contract modification
404,850,000 16,665,953 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

15%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43
Average decision length 276.67 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 30% (21 from 70)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 70)
Missing buyer ID 1% (1 from 70)
Missing call for tenders 10% (7 from 70)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 70)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 70)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (zakázek z 60 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.95 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 60 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 11 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.