Regions • 2022 • past ranking

Zlínský kraj

IČO 70891320

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

5.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 46%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČSAD BUS Uherské Hradiště a.s.
5 4,358,742,332
ARRIVA MORAVA a.s.
2 2,244,300,912
KRODOS BUS a.s.
2 2,163,998,783
Transdev Morava s.r.o.
2 1,399,339,751
TQM-holding s.r.o.
2 1,399,339,751
Other suppliers 377 13,708,546,628

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 46%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 5% (2 from 37)
Nonprice competition 40% (28 from 70)
Division into lots 29% (20 from 70)
E-auction 0% (0 from 70)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 70)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 94%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 13,358,944,944
Small scale tenders 181,517,862
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 5,862,695,182

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 63%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 12%
Average requirements modifications count 0.94
Average decision length 93.21 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 94%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 98)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 98)
Missing buyer ID 1% (1 from 98)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 98)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 98)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 98)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

61%
average 60%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 97% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 92 tenders under the law)
0-250K 10 tenders
250K-500K 40 tenders
500K-1000K 31 tenders
1000K+ 40 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 84%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.