Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Frýdlant nad Ostravicí

IČO 00296651

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Brána Beskyd I
Construction work
10
Ø4 in industry
Dopravní terminál Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy budovy MěÚ, Náměstí č.p. 3, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Chodník Lubno - III. etapa
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
1 41,270,000
STRABAG a.s.
1 33,229,200
MVEX stavby s.r.o.
2 17,278,156
INTOZA s.r.o.
1 13,891,550
PORR a.s.
1 8,798,223
Other suppliers 13 143,954,419

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

49%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 18% (3 from 17)
Division into lots 12% (2 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 277,560,517
Small scale tenders 14,392,381
Unregulated purchases 514,628,913
Total 806,581,811

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Brána Beskyd I
Contract modification
41,270,000 6,203,782 (+16%)
Stavební úpravy budovy MěÚ, Náměstí č.p. 3, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Contract modification
13,891,550 4,207,465 (+31%)
Dopravní terminál II. etapa, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Contract modification
7,228,991 1,380,010 (+20%)
Stavební úpravy v hasičské zbrojnici Frýdlant nad Ostravicí, ul. Janáčkova 652
Contract modification
6,782,000 989,646 (+15%)
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova
Contract modification
8,798,223 553,572 (+7%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20
Average decision length 45.20 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

2%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 42% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.