Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Brána Beskyd I
Construction work |
10
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dopravní terminál Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy budovy MěÚ, Náměstí č.p. 3, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Chodník Lubno - III. etapa
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
BYSTROŇ Group a.s. |
1 | 41,270,000 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 33,229,200 |
|
MVEX stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 17,278,156 |
|
INTOZA s.r.o. |
1 | 13,891,550 |
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 8,798,223 |
| Other suppliers | 13 | 143,954,419 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
BYSTROŇ Group a.s. |
1 | 41,270,000 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 33,229,200 |
|
MVEX stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 17,278,156 |
|
INTOZA s.r.o. |
1 | 13,891,550 |
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 8,798,223 |
|
EMPEMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 7,367,383 |
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
1 | 7,228,991 |
|
NOSTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,782,000 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 6,633,909 |
|
KOBIT, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,330,000 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 4,792,971 |
|
ACER WOODWAY s.r.o. |
1 | 3,920,459 |
|
I-TEC Czech, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,566,330 |
|
ATELIER 38 s.r.o. |
1 | 2,450,000 |
|
AMBRA - Group, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,944,295 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 1,468,288 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 802,352 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 40% (2 from 5) |
| Nonprice competition | 18% (3 from 17) |
| Division into lots | 12% (2 from 17) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 277,560,517 |
| Small scale tenders | 14,392,381 |
| Unregulated purchases | 514,628,913 |
| Total | 806,581,811 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 471,632,139 |
| Material consumption | 12,427,423 |
| Energy consumption | 28,677,816 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 49,377 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 2,520 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 95,516,969 |
| Travel costs | 501,329 |
| Representation costs | 427,576 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 172,339,241 |
| Small long-term property costs | 16,019,154 |
| Other costs | 8,988,267 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Brána Beskyd I Contract modification |
41,270,000 | 6,203,782 (+16%) |
|
Stavební úpravy budovy MěÚ, Náměstí č.p. 3, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí Contract modification |
13,891,550 | 4,207,465 (+31%) |
|
Dopravní terminál II. etapa, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí Contract modification |
7,228,991 | 1,380,010 (+20%) |
|
Stavební úpravy v hasičské zbrojnici Frýdlant nad Ostravicí, ul. Janáčkova 652 Contract modification |
6,782,000 | 989,646 (+15%) |
|
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova Contract modification |
8,798,223 | 553,572 (+7%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Brána Beskyd I Contract modification |
41,270,000 | 6,203,782 (+16%) |
|
Stavební úpravy budovy MěÚ, Náměstí č.p. 3, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí Contract modification |
13,891,550 | 4,207,465 (+31%) |
|
Dopravní terminál II. etapa, Frýdlant nad Ostravicí Contract modification |
7,228,991 | 1,380,010 (+20%) |
|
Stavební úpravy v hasičské zbrojnici Frýdlant nad Ostravicí, ul. Janáčkova 652 Contract modification |
6,782,000 | 989,646 (+15%) |
|
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova Contract modification |
8,798,223 | 553,572 (+7%) |
|
Oprava zpevněných ploch na hřbitově ve Frýdlantu nad Ostravicí, II a III etapa Contract modification |
7,784,156 | 283,096 (+4%) |
|
Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro potřeby JSDH Frýdlant nad Ostravicí Contract modification |
6,330,000 | 41,000 (+1%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 20% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.20 |
| Average decision length | 45.20 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brána Beskyd I | 0 | 67 | ||
| Vypracování projektové dokumentace “Využití prostor mezi MěÚ č.p. 139 a KC č.p. 1755 ve Frýdlantu nad Ostravicí“ | 1 | 39 | ||
| Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro potřeby JSDH Frýdlant nad Ostravicí | 0 | 37 | ||
| Protipovodňová opatření města a ORP Frýdlant nad Ostravicí | 0 | 46 | ||
| Dopravní terminál Frýdlant nad Ostravicí | 0 | 37 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 19) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 42% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.53 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
