Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Litovel

IČO 00299138

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s.
1 140,000,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 71,934,668
.A.S.A. odpady Litovel, s.r.o.
1 46,092,562
Stavební firma Vymětal s.r.o.
2 18,157,050
První KEY-STAV, a.s.
1 17,483,108
Other suppliers 13 161,616,300

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction 15% (3 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 290,576,576
Small scale tenders 9,940,005
Unregulated purchases 382,813,001
Total 683,329,583

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sběrný dvůr Litovel, k.ú. Nasobůrky - stavební práce
Contract modification
17,483,108 1,259,544 (+8%)
ŠKOLNÍ JÍDELNA LITOVEL, STUDENTŮ 91/1 – ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY
Contract modification
8,751,110 426,868 (+5%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

4%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 58% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.05 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.