Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
„Pojištění majetku a odpovědnost za újmu města Litovel a spolupojištěných subjektů (2020)“
Financial and insurance services |
3
Ø2 in industry |
Sdružené dodávky elektrické energie pro Statutární město Zlín, jeho příspěvkové organizace a společnosti s majetkovou účastí města Zlína na období 2020 – 2023 formou postupného nákupu
Electricity |
2
Ø2 in industry |
Město Litovel - svoz a využití či odstranění komunálního odpadu
Refuse and waste related services |
1
Ø1 in industry |
Sběrný dvůr Litovel, k.ú. Nasobůrky - stavební práce
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
Cyklistická stezka Tři Dvory, Litovel v souběhu s II/447
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 140,000,000 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 71,934,668 |
.A.S.A. odpady Litovel, s.r.o. |
1 | 46,092,562 |
Stavební firma Vymětal s.r.o. |
2 | 18,157,050 |
První KEY-STAV, a.s. |
1 | 17,483,108 |
Other suppliers | 13 | 161,616,300 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 140,000,000 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 71,934,668 |
.A.S.A. odpady Litovel, s.r.o. |
1 | 46,092,562 |
Stavební firma Vymětal s.r.o. |
2 | 18,157,050 |
První KEY-STAV, a.s. |
1 | 17,483,108 |
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s. |
1 | 15,959,473 |
ELEKTRO JARMAR, S.R.O. |
1 | 14,544,742 |
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 9,181,000 |
LB 2000, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,883,745 |
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 5,000,000 |
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,120,200 |
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
2 | 3,323,175 |
AUTOCONT a.s. |
1 | 2,871,975 |
CONTE spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,277,365 |
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,789,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 3) |
Nonprice competition | 10% (2 from 20) |
Division into lots | 5% (1 from 20) |
E-auction | 15% (3 from 20) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 20) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 290,576,576 |
Small scale tenders | 9,940,005 |
Unregulated purchases | 382,813,001 |
Total | 683,329,583 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 449,584,644 |
Material consumption | 16,973,002 |
Energy consumption | 24,156,703 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 1,072,736 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 57,441,144 |
Travel costs | 324,621 |
Representation costs | 1,049,742 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 111,620,830 |
Small long-term property costs | 13,986,501 |
Other costs | 7,119,659 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sběrný dvůr Litovel, k.ú. Nasobůrky - stavební práce Contract modification |
17,483,108 | 1,259,544 (+8%) |
ŠKOLNÍ JÍDELNA LITOVEL, STUDENTŮ 91/1 – ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY Contract modification |
8,751,110 | 426,868 (+5%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sběrný dvůr Litovel, k.ú. Nasobůrky - stavební práce Contract modification |
17,483,108 | 1,259,544 (+8%) |
ŠKOLNÍ JÍDELNA LITOVEL, STUDENTŮ 91/1 – ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY Contract modification |
8,751,110 | 426,868 (+5%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
Cancelled contracts | 0% |
Average requirements modifications count | 0.17 |
Average decision length | 59.83 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 20) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 20) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 20) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 20) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 20) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 20) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 58% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 2.05 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.