Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Litovel

IČO 00299138

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

76.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 64,884,045
MODOS spol. s r.o.
4 52,978,993
INSTA CZ s.r.o.
1 35,922,621
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s.
2 27,582,515
Elektro Jarmar s.r.o.
1 14,544,742
Other suppliers 17 66,307,950

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

36%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 9% (2 from 22)
Division into lots 14% (3 from 22)
E-auction 14% (3 from 22)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 227,293,129
Small scale tenders 7,068,030
Unregulated purchases 607,175,772
Total 841,536,931

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Výstavba kanalizační sítě ve městě Litovel – místní část Myslechovice a v obci Haňovice
Contract modification
71,845,242 3,422,827 (+5%)
ŠKOLNÍ JÍDELNA LITOVEL, STUDENTŮ 91/1 – ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY
Contract modification
8,751,110 426,868 (+5%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

8%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 52% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.62 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders