Government - small authorities • 2022

Krajské ředitelství policie hlavního města Prahy

IČO 75151472

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Show average values  
34%
Bidder participation
85%
Winner concentration
41%
Pro-competitive tools
48%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
37%
Consistent conduct
94%
Journal data quality
80%
Buyer profile data quality
75%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Bezhotovostní odběr pohonných hmot formou karet dle RD MV-175143-27/OSM-2019
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Dodání PHM - benzínu NATURAL 95 na základě rámcové dohody MV-66265-28/OSM-2019 na období od 1. 1. 2020 do 31. 12. 2021
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Dodání osobních silničních vozidel civilních na základě rámcové dohody MV-67470-90/OSM - 2019-část A pro VS a SKPV
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Provádění oprav služebních dopravních prostředků Krajského ředitelství policie hl. m. Prahy v roce 2018
Repair and maintenance services of motor vehicles and associated equipment
2
Ø1 in industry
Provedení stavební akce - realizace energetických úspor v objektu Krajského ředitelství policie hl. m. Prahy RZ MORAVA
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ŠKODA AUTO a.s.
 11 147,913,918
ČEPRO, a.s.
 4 79,601,215
UNIPETROL RPA, s.r.o.
 4 68,952,159
AUTO PAPOUŠEK s.r.o.
 2 38,567,492
Pavel Šubník
 1 28,925,619
Other suppliers 378 414,397,141

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

41%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 32% (6 from 19)
Nonprice competition 6% (2 from 34)
Division into lots 15% (5 from 34)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 34)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 34)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

48%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 201,367,425
Small scale tenders 671,723,670
Unregulated purchases 2,848,514,569
Total 3,721,605,663

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

37%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 63%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0
Average decision length 57.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 6% (2 from 34)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 34)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

80%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (zakázek z 22 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 166 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 57 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 44 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 94 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.