Government - small authorities • 2022

Národní ústav duševního zdraví

IČO 00023752

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Show average values  
45%
Bidder participation
96%
Winner concentration
23%
Pro-competitive tools
49%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
57%
Competitive contracting
65%
Consistent conduct
97%
Journal data quality
65%
Buyer profile data quality
75%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Modernizace HW infrastruktury
Servers
2
Ø2 in industry
Rozvoj nemocničního informačního systému
Information systems
1
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění celodenní stravy pro hospitalizované pacienty
Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services
2
Ø2 in industry
Hmotnostní spektrometr LC / MS / MS s vysokým rozlišením
Software package and information systems
1
Ø1 in industry
Hmotnostní spektrometr typu trojitý kvadrupól
Software package and information systems
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Networksys a.s.
 1 23,425,638
STAPRO s.r.o.
 1 14,939,482
AMEDIS, spol. s r.o.
 2 11,489,700
GZD s.r.o.
 1 8,833,000
Siemens Healthcare, s.r.o.
 1 7,960,080
Other suppliers 23 18,312,330

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

23%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (1 from 13)
Nonprice competition 15% (2 from 13)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 13)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 13)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 13)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 54,651,658
Small scale tenders 15,308,513
Unregulated purchases 217,723,923
Total 287,684,094

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

57%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Provádění servisní činnosti a údržby na zařízení Magnetom Prisma
Technical exclusivity 		- 7,960,080
Připojení NUDZ do velké infrastruktury Cesnet
Technical exclusivity 		- 1,728,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.23
Average decision length 82.08 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 13% (2 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

65%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (zakázek z 13 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 9 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 4 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 5 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 3 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.