Government - small authorities • 2022

Správa Národního parku České Švýcarsko

IČO 06342477

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

33.
ranking
70%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 40%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POLANSKÝ GROUP a.s.
1 32,891,513
Marek Klofáč
5 26,272,044
Hanko CZ s.r.o.
4 25,374,000
HEDERA ZIMA, spol. s r.o.
3 20,604,865
KK Lignum s.r.o.
11 20,427,584
Other suppliers 35 69,083,739

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

43%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (4 from 22)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 22)
Division into lots 32% (7 from 22)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 22)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 175,950,129
Small scale tenders 1,011,000
Unregulated purchases 80,802,891
Total 257,764,020

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce objektu Vysoká Lípa č.p.14
Contract modification
7,574,374 1,652,181 (+22%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0.27
Average decision length 27.32 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

20%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (zakázek z 21 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.19 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 1 zakázka
more than 1mil Kč 0 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.