Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 14

IČO 00231312

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

31.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace budov ÚMČ Praha 14 č.p. 1072 a 1073
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní centrum Jahodnice - novostavba - I. etapa
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba 4 kmenových tříd, Základní škola Vybíralova
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Hloubětínská čp. 700 – rekonstrukce rozvodů elektroinstalace, vytápění a zdravotechniky
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Nové zelené střechy na objektech ZŠ - Část 1: Nové zelené střechy na objektu ZŠ Bratří Venclíků, Praha 14
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PARECO s.r.o.
8 109,835,758
KVS stavební, s.r.o.
18 91,509,109
Metrostav a.s.
2 76,456,445
ENESA a.s.
1 58,600,000
Entalpa s.r.o.
2 34,728,054
Other suppliers 148 663,367,075

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

55%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (1 from 12)
Nonprice competition 17% (7 from 42)
Division into lots 26% (11 from 42)
E-auction 0% (0 from 42)
Innovative procedure 5% (2 from 42)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce objektu Vybíralova 969 a výtah
Contract modification
7,492,669 1,587,557 (+22%)
Revitalizace budov ÚMČ Praha 14 č.p. 1072 a 1073
Contract modification
117,200,000 714,592 (+1%)
Vybíralova 969 výtah
Contract modification
895,063 114,253 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 44)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 44)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 98% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 40 tenders under the law)
0-250K 33 tenders
250K-500K 10 tenders
500K-1000K 14 tenders
1000K+ 33 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.