Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 14

IČO 00231312

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

8.
ranking
77%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace budov ÚMČ Praha 14 č.p. 1072 a 1073
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
2
Ø3 in industry
Přístavba s tělocvičnou pro ZŠ Šimanovská – opakované zadání
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní centrum Hloubětínská 55
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Hloubětínská čp. 700 – rekonstrukce rozvodů elektroinstalace, vytápění a zdravotechniky
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Energetická renovace objektů ZŠ v Praze 14 - Rekuperace ZŠ Generála Janouška
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POHL cz, a.s.
1 59,741,451
ENESA a.s.
1 58,600,000
Metrostav a.s.
1 58,600,000
Right Concept, a.s.
4 51,424,878
KVS stavební, s.r.o.
10 49,672,058
Other suppliers 189 423,276,652

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

48%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 7% (1 from 15)
Nonprice competition 17% (8 from 46)
Division into lots 15% (7 from 46)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 46)
Innovative procedure 4% (2 from 46)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce objektu Vybíralova 969 a výtah
Contract modification
7,492,669 1,587,557 (+22%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 0.47
Average decision length 83.11 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 46)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 46)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 46)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 46)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 46)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 46)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

74%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 46 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.72 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 46 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 69 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 14 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 26 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 34 zakázek