Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha-Suchdol

IČO 00231231

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kulturně-komunitní centrum
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Zahrady se hřbitovem u kaple sv. Václava
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Suchdol - zkvalitnění vnitřního prostředí učeben a navýšení kapacity
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka pro městskou část Praha - Suchdol
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry
Modernizace a rozšíření areálu ZŠ M. Alše - část rekonstrukce fasády původní budovy
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
2 27,598,300
4P INVEST, s.r.o.
1 17,477,987
ov architekti, s.r.o.
1 10,250,000
AMIKA FIRST s.r.o.
3 9,095,537
KOBIT, spol. s r.o.
1 6,775,000
Other suppliers 7 61,972,403

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
ZŠ Suchdol - zkvalitnění vnitřního prostředí učeben a navýšení kapacity
Contract modification
11,610,812 3,032,731 (+27%)
Kulturně-komunitní centrum
Contract modification
17,477,987 2,482,193 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.