Buyer uses e-auctions to achieve lower prices. Court found serious misconduct.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Výstavba MŠ Mydlinky v pasivním standardu
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace Sofijského náměstí - 1. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Adaptační opatření na změnu klimatu, MŠ Pastelka v Praze 12
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných prostranství - Část D – Údržba veřejné zeleně a úklid veřejných prostranství (Imrychova, Lhotecká, Rytířova, Čs. exilu a lesním porostem u Lhoteckého potoka (vč. sportovního areálu VOSA))
Horticultural services |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných prostranství - Část C – Údržba veřejné zeleně a úklid veřejných prostranství (Durychova, Šatrova, U Vodojemu, Novodvorská, Smotlachova, Zelenkova a Generála Šišky)
Horticultural services |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
GEOSAN GROUP a.s. |
1 | 53,306,294 |
|
NEPRO stavební a.s. |
1 | 53,306,294 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 40,484,387 |
|
FREKO a.s. |
3 | 38,406,464 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
4 | 31,813,284 |
| Other suppliers | 18 | 267,391,280 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
GEOSAN GROUP a.s. |
1 | 53,306,294 |
|
NEPRO stavební a.s. |
1 | 53,306,294 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 40,484,387 |
|
FREKO a.s. |
3 | 38,406,464 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
4 | 31,813,284 |
|
KONSIT a.s. |
1 | 25,769,768 |
|
SAMSON PRAHA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 11,871,188 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 11,470,825 |
|
KyraStav spol. s r.o. |
1 | 10,807,340 |
|
BBP Stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 9,412,372 |
|
GASTRO-EIS-TECHNIK CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 9,410,000 |
|
Pražská energetika, a.s. |
2 | 9,333,018 |
|
TÚZ s.r.o. |
2 | 8,172,965 |
|
Decorum spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,268,299 |
|
NEWTON Business Development, a.s. |
1 | 3,000,000 |
|
Interier Říčany a.s. |
1 | 2,557,747 |
|
TOKA s.r.o. |
1 | 2,349,962 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 2,141,836 |
|
ROWAN LEGAL, advokátní kancelář s.r.o. |
1 | 1,920,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 14% (1 from 7) |
| Nonprice competition | 10% (2 from 20) |
| Division into lots | 20% (4 from 20) |
| E-auction | 10% (2 from 20) |
| Innovative procedure | 10% (2 from 20) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
| Name | Misconduct |
|---|---|
| Zprostředkování prodeje nemovitostí pro městskou část Praha 12 | YES |
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 13% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.00 |
| Average decision length | 67.63 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sdružené dodávky elektrické energie pro centrálního zadavatele MČ Praha 12 pro roky 2020 a 2021 | 0 | 83 | ||
| Výstavba MŠ Mydlinky v pasivním standardu | 3 | 55 | ||
| Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných prostranství | 1 | 78 | ||
| „Nová základní škola Komořany“ | 0 | 119 | ||
| Výkon funkce správce stavby Nová radnice Prahy 12 | 0 | 38 | ||
| Mobiliář - nábytek pro objekt „Nové radnice Prahy 12“ | 2 | 63 | ||
| Sdružené dodávky zemního plynu pro centrálního zadavatele MČ Praha 12 pro roky 2020 a 2021 | 0 | 49 | ||
| Výstavba MŠ Mydlinky v pasivním standardu | 2 | 56 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 21) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 71% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.81 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
