Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 12

IČO 00231151

Buyer uses e-auctions to achieve lower prices. Court found serious misconduct.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 53,306,294
NEPRO stavební a.s.
1 53,306,294
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 40,484,387
FREKO a.s.
3 38,406,464
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o.
4 31,813,284
Other suppliers 18 267,391,280

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (1 from 7)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 20% (4 from 20)
E-auction 10% (2 from 20)
Innovative procedure 10% (2 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00
Average decision length 67.63 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

26%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.81 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.