Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 9

IČO 00063894

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Novostavba objektu základní a mateřské školy v lokalitě U Elektry - opakované řízení
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
6
Ø4 in industry
Dostavba a revitalizace Parku Přátelství
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
3
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ a MŠ Na Balabence - navýšení počtu tříd
Construction work for school buildings
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce historické budovy U Brabců
Restructuring work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce a dostavba komunitního centra Jablonecká
Restoration work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PP 53, a.s.
2 269,172,918
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 109,788,584
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 75,955,402
Z&D stavební společnost, spol. s r.o.
2 44,570,283
EDIKT a.s.
1 31,670,303
Other suppliers 11 423,622,838

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 53% (9 from 17)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 17)
E-auction 6% (1 from 17)
Innovative procedure 6% (1 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce historické budovy U Brabců
Contract modification
64,899,971 14,336,450 (+23%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

12%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 84% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.37 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.