Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 9

IČO 00063894

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Garážový parkovací dům Prosek
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce historické budovy U Brabců
Restructuring work
4
Ø3 in industry
Stavba č. 8268 - Rokytka - rozvoj území - etapa 0006 - Park Zahrádky, I. a II. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce a dostavba komunitního centra Jablonecká
Restoration work
2
Ø3 in industry
Základní škola u Elektry - projektová dokumentace
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PP 53, a.s.
2 153,002,601
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 49,619,791
EDIKT a.s.
1 31,670,303
OK STAVBY s.r.o.
1 17,963,643
Z&D stavební společnost, spol. s r.o.
1 15,892,314
Other suppliers 9 65,055,896

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce historické budovy U Brabců
Contract modification
64,899,971 14,336,450 (+23%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 10%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 111.13 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

8%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 63% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.88 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders