Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses |
5
Ø5 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Restoration work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. - Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných budovách MČ Praha 7
Energy and related services |
5
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
RENASTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 69,829,687 |
|
KONSIT a.s. |
2 | 57,859,815 |
|
JK stav - realizace staveb s.r.o. |
2 | 25,440,611 |
|
ENESA a.s. |
1 | 20,240,901 |
|
premise, s.r.o. |
1 | 17,480,000 |
| Other suppliers | 26 | 217,075,947 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
RENASTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 69,829,687 |
|
KONSIT a.s. |
2 | 57,859,815 |
|
JK stav - realizace staveb s.r.o. |
2 | 25,440,611 |
|
ENESA a.s. |
1 | 20,240,901 |
|
premise, s.r.o. |
1 | 17,480,000 |
|
BUILDER CONSTRUCTIONS s.r.o. |
1 | 16,449,973 |
|
LAMA PB s.r.o. |
1 | 15,622,505 |
|
Compo Praha Interiéry s.r.o. |
1 | 9,612,188 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST GUTTENBERG s.r.o. |
1 | 9,303,390 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
1 | 7,829,511 |
|
REALM Group s.r.o. |
1 | 7,590,410 |
|
Ing. Jan Švejkovský, Ph.D. |
2 | 6,983,835 |
|
WANDEL CZECH s.r.o. |
1 | 6,502,956 |
|
AREN VT, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,093,624 |
|
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 4,131,120 |
|
Gabriel s.r.o. |
1 | 3,965,765 |
|
TeS, spol. s r.o. Chotěboř |
1 | 3,799,837 |
|
BLESK Servis s.r.o. |
1 | 3,640,306 |
|
MY DVA group a.s. |
2 | 3,257,930 |
|
UnitX s.r.o. |
1 | 2,990,000 |
|
MAFRA, a.s. |
1 | 2,904,000 |
|
YYYY s.r.o. |
2 | 2,490,600 |
|
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 2,192,742 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 2,192,742 |
|
Česká truhlářská společnost s.r.o. |
1 | 1,697,352 |
|
GORDIC spol. s r.o. |
1 | 841,813 |
|
gogolák + grasse s.r.o. |
1 | 150,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 7) |
| Nonprice competition | 17% (5 from 30) |
| Division into lots | 13% (4 from 30) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Innovative procedure | 7% (2 from 30) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla Contract modification |
57,859,815 | 1,832,267 (+4%) |
|
Rekonstrukce dětského hřiště Ortenovo náměstí _ Praha 7 Contract modification |
7,829,511 | 1,393,873 (+18%) |
|
Rekonstrukce vnitrobloku U Vody vč. opravy vozovky Contract modification |
6,502,956 | 940,983 (+15%) |
|
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7 Contract modification |
35,178,005 | 883,869 (+3%) |
|
Revitalizace lékařského domu Dukelských hrdinů 342/1 Contract modification |
16,449,973 | 860,389 (+6%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 10% |
| Cancelled contracts | 10% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0 |
| Average decision length | 120.56 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 31) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 41% (zakázek z 29 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.34 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 29 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
