Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 7

IČO 00063754

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Restoration work
6
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. - Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø4 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných budovách MČ Praha 7
Energy and related services
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
RENASTAV s.r.o.
2 69,829,687
KONSIT a.s.
2 57,859,815
JK stav - realizace staveb s.r.o.
2 25,440,611
ENESA a.s.
1 20,240,901
premise, s.r.o.
1 17,480,000
Other suppliers 26 217,075,947

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

43%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 17% (5 from 30)
Division into lots 13% (4 from 30)
E-auction 0% (0 from 30)
Innovative procedure 7% (2 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla
Contract modification
57,859,815 1,832,267 (+4%)
Rekonstrukce dětského hřiště Ortenovo náměstí _ Praha 7
Contract modification
7,829,511 1,393,873 (+18%)
Rekonstrukce vnitrobloku U Vody vč. opravy vozovky
Contract modification
6,502,956 940,983 (+15%)
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Contract modification
35,178,005 883,869 (+3%)
Revitalizace lékařského domu Dukelských hrdinů 342/1
Contract modification
16,449,973 860,389 (+6%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 31)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 31)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 41% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.34 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 29 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.