Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 7

IČO 00063754

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

76.
ranking
70%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nová radnice pro Prahu 7
Construction work for commercial buildings, warehouses and industrial buildings, buildings relating to transport
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Dobrovského 537/19, Praha 7
Restoration work
6
Ø3 in industry
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. - Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø3 in industry
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla - Část 1. Levé křídlo a střední část
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø3 in industry
SAZ Praha 7 - Adaptace objektu Fr. Křížka 22 pro zdravotnické služby
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 106,950,764
Metrostav a.s.
1 106,950,764
KONSIT a.s.
3 85,197,112
RENASTAV s.r.o.
1 34,651,682
Speciální stavby Most spol. s r.o.
1 22,450,000
Other suppliers 82 194,467,049

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

25%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 5% (1 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nová radnice pro Prahu 7
Contract modification
213,901,527 29,485,363 (+14%)
ZŠ TGM reko půdního prostoru - boční křídla
Contract modification
68,166,162 1,521,093 (+3%)
Revitalizace lékařského domu Dukelských hrdinů 342/1
Contract modification
16,449,973 860,389 (+6%)
Nová radnice pro Prahu 7 – Vybavení nábytkem – Část A - vestavěný nábytek
Contract modification
9,612,188 816,754 (+9%)
Rekonstrukce školního sportovního areálu při ZŠ T.G.M.
Contract modification
11,901,589 439,654 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50
Average decision length 118.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (zakázek z 23 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.13 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 2 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 26 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 31 zakázek