Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Raudnitzův dům - bydlení pro seniory
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Bydlení pro seniory se sociální službou Hlubočepy
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
ZŠ Waldorfská, obj. Mezi rolemi 34/8, Praha 5 - Jinonice - provedení nového pavilonu
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Výměna oken na východní, západní a jižní straně objektu vč. slunolamů a zateplení pláště budovy Polikliniky Barrandov
Structures construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
ZŠ Nepomucká, zateplení objektu a výměna oken
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
KyraStav spol. s r.o. |
8 | 85,151,289 |
|
POZIMOS, a.s. |
1 | 68,828,000 |
|
POHL cz, a.s. |
3 | 68,662,347 |
|
AQUASYS spol. s r.o. |
1 | 59,427,823 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
2 | 58,872,260 |
| Other suppliers | 241 | 972,490,065 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
KyraStav spol. s r.o. |
8 | 85,151,289 |
|
POZIMOS, a.s. |
1 | 68,828,000 |
|
POHL cz, a.s. |
3 | 68,662,347 |
|
AQUASYS spol. s r.o. |
1 | 59,427,823 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
2 | 58,872,260 |
|
Raeder & Falge s.r.o. |
1 | 45,839,000 |
|
KASTEN spol. s r.o. |
1 | 39,806,888 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 38,480,000 |
|
TRUSTAV s.r.o. |
6 | 27,114,005 |
|
Rekomont, a.s. |
1 | 25,465,298 |
|
KVS stavební, s.r.o. |
3 | 20,301,577 |
|
ACG-Real s.r.o. |
2 | 16,626,705 |
|
Belstav CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 16,363,367 |
|
Gabriel s.r.o. |
1 | 16,191,272 |
|
Zbigniew Gierczak |
1 | 15,870,791 |
|
TRUHLÁŘSTVÍ PETR KAISER s.r.o. |
1 | 14,845,088 |
|
FETTERS management, s.r.o. |
4 | 12,353,400 |
|
PREMIO INVEST s.r.o. |
1 | 10,758,509 |
|
EPLcond a.s. |
3 | 9,790,200 |
|
RUBIKON stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 9,648,803 |
|
Grimax |
5 | 9,187,535 |
|
SMART SBD s.r.o. |
5 | 8,922,328 |
|
Vekra stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 8,619,188 |
|
JK stav - realizace staveb s.r.o. |
1 | 8,611,839 |
|
KOZÁK stavební s.r.o. |
4 | 8,426,532 |
|
HOME WEST CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 7,748,322 |
|
ISPD s.r.o. |
2 | 7,722,962 |
|
INPROS PRAHA a.s. |
2 | 7,475,533 |
|
DAP. a.s. |
4 | 7,299,363 |
|
PMA, s.r.o. |
3 | 7,143,036 |
|
OPREKO, s.r.o. |
1 | 7,117,951 |
|
SAMSON PRAHA, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 6,281,451 |
|
ID Stavby Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 5,420,000 |
|
DF Servis, s.r.o. |
2 | 5,338,378 |
|
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
1 | 5,336,400 |
|
MultiSport Benefit, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,200,000 |
|
Formstav s. r. o. |
1 | 5,023,978 |
|
V.L.2001 s.r.o. |
1 | 5,000,000 |
|
Triangl, a.s. |
1 | 4,909,080 |
|
Energobest s.r.o. |
1 | 4,900,000 |
|
MINERA stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,781,489 |
|
EMTANDEM s.r.o. |
3 | 4,706,023 |
|
H & B delta, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,689,090 |
|
Vladimír Karban - MTL |
2 | 4,321,439 |
|
H-FLOOR s.r.o. |
1 | 4,000,000 |
|
TOTAL SERVICE a.s. |
1 | 3,949,865 |
|
ISCO spol. s r.o. |
2 | 3,916,023 |
|
Caleum a.s. |
1 | 3,895,000 |
|
LEVEL,a.s. |
1 | 3,889,579 |
|
KOOA |
2 | 3,792,900 |
|
NENADAL s.r.o. |
1 | 3,779,335 |
|
EDIKT a.s. |
1 | 3,623,504 |
|
Miloš Fišer |
2 | 3,379,557 |
|
IVPS Inženýrská výstavba a pozemní stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 3,321,171 |
|
DECOLED s.r.o. |
3 | 3,222,292 |
|
CAUTUS PROJECTS a.s. |
2 | 3,166,667 |
|
Markéta Stránská |
2 | 2,996,090 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
1 | 2,935,317 |
|
PEGAS CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,891,304 |
|
SL HOLDING CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,851,468 |
|
AVK STAV s.r.o. |
1 | 2,796,096 |
|
REINVEST spol. s r.o. |
20 | 2,543,010 |
|
COPYMAT spol. s r.o. |
2 | 2,542,098 |
|
Karel Zukal |
1 | 2,500,000 |
|
DM Color s.r.o. |
1 | 2,500,000 |
|
PB SCOM s.r.o. |
1 | 2,438,377 |
|
BREMA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,287,469 |
|
WALCO CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,242,056 |
|
K S F spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,234,983 |
|
Inženýring dopravních staveb a.s. |
2 | 2,111,200 |
|
PBW GROUP s.r.o. |
1 | 2,107,465 |
|
Čermák a Hrachovec a.s. |
2 | 2,097,878 |
|
H + H TECHNIKA, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 2,089,936 |
|
Evropská rozvojová agentura, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,990,000 |
|
Affect, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,990,000 |
|
SPS správa nemovitostí, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,990,000 |
|
Marbes s.r.o. |
1 | 1,986,000 |
|
A69 - architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 1,949,000 |
|
ATELIER 11 HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ společnost s ručením omezeným (s.r.o.) |
1 | 1,945,000 |
|
JPM Group s.r.o. |
1 | 1,941,679 |
|
MGR.A. Jan NEDVĚD |
1 | 1,930,000 |
|
prof. akad. arch. Mikuláš Hulec |
1 | 1,890,000 |
|
A.D.N.S. architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 1,890,000 |
|
ABCD Studio, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,886,200 |
|
SUDOP PRAHA a.s. |
1 | 1,870,000 |
|
Artspect, a.s. |
1 | 1,866,090 |
|
Jan Bělovský |
1 | 1,800,000 |
|
Ing. arch. Michal Pešák |
1 | 1,800,000 |
|
IP4life s.r.o. |
1 | 1,794,000 |
|
VPÚ DECO PRAHA a.s. |
1 | 1,775,000 |
|
AND, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,740,000 |
|
TOM - computer, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,685,200 |
|
Mgr. Ing. Jakub Mašek, advokát |
1 | 1,661,675 |
|
Atelier P.H.A.spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,650,000 |
|
FRIGOSYSTEM, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,643,409 |
|
ABM architekti, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,570,000 |
|
BSS Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 1,490,900 |
|
Bianco architects, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,440,000 |
|
OWO.CZ, s.r.o. |
6 | 1,430,000 |
|
ENNIT, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,415,000 |
|
Mgr. Jiří Kučera, advokát |
1 | 1,350,000 |
|
KyraStav Energy, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,349,223 |
|
RH – ARCHITEKTI s.r.o. |
1 | 1,240,000 |
|
Studio PHX s.r.o. |
1 | 1,195,000 |
|
JM - Elektro s.r.o. |
1 | 1,159,809 |
|
Montyfaj, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,155,117 |
|
BIT SERVIS spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,114,994 |
|
terra florida, v.o.s. |
1 | 1,110,000 |
|
KSP Computer & Services, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,087,512 |
|
EUC PLS s.r.o. |
1 | 1,067,780 |
|
DOMISTAV CZ a.s. |
1 | 1,049,441 |
|
HITART Europe s.r.o. |
1 | 1,000,000 |
|
MGA GREIF s.r.o. |
1 | 993,000 |
|
SUNCAD, s.r.o. |
1 | 990,000 |
|
Project Management Service s.r.o. |
1 | 954,800 |
|
KERT, s.r.o. |
1 | 944,352 |
|
ELIV, s.r.o. |
1 | 883,294 |
|
ARCHUM architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 850,000 |
|
kcarch s.r.o. |
1 | 850,000 |
|
TOPSOFT JKM spol. s r.o. |
2 | 848,320 |
|
Kancelářské stroje s.r.o. |
1 | 807,030 |
|
PV Stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 786,968 |
|
STAND CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 732,018 |
|
STIS stavební a inženýrská společnost, s.r.o. |
5 | 731,380 |
|
ELPO, kabelové sítě VN a NN, s.r.o. |
1 | 730,035 |
|
DCI Czech a.s. |
1 | 686,000 |
|
ROWAN LEGAL, advokátní kancelář s.r.o. |
1 | 682,500 |
|
PhDr. Josef Holeček |
1 | 680,000 |
|
OB-LIGO realizace staveb s.r.o. |
1 | 669,752 |
|
TP ingestav s.r.o. |
1 | 648,260 |
|
Libor Marek |
1 | 593,000 |
|
Jindřich Vítek JUDr. Ph.D. |
1 | 589,000 |
|
Af Office, s.r.o. |
1 | 567,570 |
|
PORSENNA o.p.s. |
1 | 550,000 |
|
APERA, s.r.o. |
1 | 525,000 |
|
DEROS, s.r.o. |
1 | 503,194 |
|
PUDIS a.s. |
1 | 495,000 |
|
FH SERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 479,304 |
|
DŘEVOSLAV s.r.o. |
1 | 478,908 |
|
KOMOVIA s.r.o. |
1 | 474,000 |
|
CENTRA a.s. |
1 | 454,545 |
|
Karlínblok s.r.o. |
1 | 446,000 |
|
Moore Czech Republic s.r.o. |
2 | 428,000 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 421,324 |
|
P.K.E. s. r. o. |
1 | 418,500 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 398,820 |
|
PROARCH, s.r.o. |
1 | 392,000 |
|
PAGINA BOHEMIA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 376,000 |
|
ov architekti, s.r.o. |
1 | 339,000 |
|
DAM architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 300,000 |
|
JE Group s.r.o. |
1 | 295,000 |
|
ROCREST a.s. |
1 | 256,349 |
|
GEOtest, a.s. |
1 | 248,000 |
|
Grant Thornton Advisory s.r.o. |
1 | 245,000 |
|
XEROX CZECH REPUBLIC s.r.o. |
1 | 77,978 |
|
Roman Nýč Ing. |
1 | 42,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 12% (2 from 17) |
| Nonprice competition | 24% (15 from 63) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 63) |
| E-auction | 2% (1 from 63) |
| Innovative procedure | 5% (3 from 63) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Výměna oken na východní, západní a jižní straně objektu vč. slunolamů a zateplení pláště budovy Polikliniky Barrandov Contract modification |
39,806,888 | 3,426,807 (+9%) |
|
Výměna oken a balkonových dveří v objektech Radlická 2000/3 a Ostrovského 11/16, Praha 5 - Smíchov (Ženské domovy) Contract modification |
14,845,088 | 3,234,129 (+22%) |
|
Škola Smíchov-projektová dokumentace, inženýrská činnost, autorský dozor Contract modification |
31,741,581 | 480,000 (+2%) |
|
Monitoring pro Motolskou skládku, Praha 5 Additional works |
- | 248,000 |
|
RÁMCOVÁ DOHODA NA PROVIZORNÍ ZAJIŠTĚNÍ ÚDRŽBY ZELENĚ A ÚKLIDOVÝCH PRACÍ NA ÚZEMÍ MČ PRAHA 5 Emergency |
- | Not disclosed |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Výměna oken na východní, západní a jižní straně objektu vč. slunolamů a zateplení pláště budovy Polikliniky Barrandov Contract modification |
39,806,888 | 3,426,807 (+9%) |
|
Výměna oken a balkonových dveří v objektech Radlická 2000/3 a Ostrovského 11/16, Praha 5 - Smíchov (Ženské domovy) Contract modification |
14,845,088 | 3,234,129 (+22%) |
|
Škola Smíchov-projektová dokumentace, inženýrská činnost, autorský dozor Contract modification |
31,741,581 | 480,000 (+2%) |
|
Monitoring pro Motolskou skládku, Praha 5 Additional works |
- | 248,000 |
|
RÁMCOVÁ DOHODA NA PROVIZORNÍ ZAJIŠTĚNÍ ÚDRŽBY ZELENĚ A ÚKLIDOVÝCH PRACÍ NA ÚZEMÍ MČ PRAHA 5 Emergency |
- | Not disclosed |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 14% |
| Cancelled contracts | 9% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.14 |
| Average decision length | 104.79 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 66) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 66) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 66) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 66) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 66) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 66) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 96% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.89 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 57 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
