Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 5

IČO 00063631

Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

92.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
CENTRA a.s.
3 178,014,560
CDV služby, s.r.o.
2 172,110,560
POHL cz, a.s.
1 59,427,823
AQUASYS spol. s r.o.
1 59,427,823
Gardenline s.r.o.
3 51,104,025
Other suppliers 97 557,745,538

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

47%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (3 from 15)
Nonprice competition 34% (20 from 58)
Division into lots 2% (1 from 58)
E-auction 2% (1 from 58)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 58)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
RÁMCOVÁ DOHODA NA PROVIZORNÍ ZAJIŠTĚNÍ ÚKLIDU A ÚDRŽBY ZELENĚ NA PRAZE 5
Emergency
- 31,824,426
Pronájem 2 kombinovaných pracovišť CDBP (včetně fotokabin)
Technical exclusivity
- 2,034,762
Monitoring pro Motolskou skládku, Praha 5
Additional works
- 248,000

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 61)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 61)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 97% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.85 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 60 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 10 tenders
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 28 tenders