Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Úprava bezmotorové komunikace A2 a A26
Paths and other metalled surfaces |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Komunální služby Praha 8
Refuse and waste related services |
3
Ø1 in industry |
|
Pojištění movitého a nemovitého majetku, odpovědnosti za újmu pro MČ Praha 8 a její organizace
Insurance services |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Poskytování bezpečnostních služeb ve vybraných objektech ÚMČ Praha 8
Security services |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce a nástavba budovy v užívání Městské policie hl. m. Prahy, na adrese Balabánova 1273/2, Praha 8 - Kobylisy
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
IPODEC - ČISTÉ MĚSTO a.s. |
1 | 34,491,728 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 22,198,387 |
|
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s. |
1 | 22,198,387 |
|
SCSA Security spol. s r.o. |
2 | 21,715,944 |
|
BAB mont s.r.o. |
1 | 18,692,222 |
| Other suppliers | 70 | 253,832,447 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
IPODEC - ČISTÉ MĚSTO a.s. |
1 | 34,491,728 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 22,198,387 |
|
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s. |
1 | 22,198,387 |
|
SCSA Security spol. s r.o. |
2 | 21,715,944 |
|
BAB mont s.r.o. |
1 | 18,692,222 |
|
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 11,886,000 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 11,886,000 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 10,598,185 |
|
Bratři Gallové & spol. s.r.o. |
1 | 10,593,768 |
|
GESTO COMPUTERS, spol. s r.o. |
10 | 9,295,610 |
|
VDC kancelářská technika s.r.o. |
7 | 7,241,231 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
3 | 7,112,123 |
|
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. |
3 | 5,940,000 |
|
WIA spol. s r.o. |
3 | 5,670,576 |
|
ICZ a.s. |
2 | 5,300,000 |
|
ASAGRAPH s.r.o. |
2 | 5,203,424 |
|
Pavel Gardavský |
2 | 3,957,480 |
|
LaMa Operations s.r.o. |
2 | 3,575,510 |
|
Z+M Logistics, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,767,560 |
|
MK - mont illuminations s.r.o. |
2 | 2,489,247 |
|
Tredaton |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
TÚZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
REVITAL - VRBČANY, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
CEBU service s.r.o. |
2 | 2,000,000 |
|
Petr Mikeš |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
GARPEN ZAHRADNICKÁ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
RTD servis, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
JUDr. Antonín Blažek |
1 | 1,990,000 |
|
UNIT architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 1,930,000 |
|
RENOMIA, a. s. |
1 | 1,920,000 |
|
PILUM s.r.o. |
1 | 1,819,200 |
|
Atop-aqua s.r.o. |
1 | 1,643,400 |
|
Rexonix s.r.o. |
2 | 1,630,771 |
|
Česká distribuční k.s. |
2 | 1,581,855 |
|
PAX, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,500,000 |
|
IT-služby s.r.o. |
1 | 1,430,544 |
|
OMNILINK Services a.s. |
1 | 1,375,640 |
|
Boa Construction s.r.o. |
1 | 1,240,750 |
|
ADCALL systems, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,230,720 |
|
CARS4SALE s.r.o. |
1 | 1,159,000 |
|
Ernst & Young, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,144,000 |
|
MENHIR Praha, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,000,000 |
|
Zdeněk Němec |
1 | 922,992 |
|
DEVELICT Solutions s.r.o. |
1 | 921,600 |
|
M.C.TRITON, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 920,000 |
|
Požární bezpečnost s.r.o. |
1 | 797,900 |
|
VSP spol. s r.o. |
1 | 782,000 |
|
ARCHUM architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 675,000 |
|
Silesia WM s.r.o. |
1 | 669,894 |
|
SVI AJAK services s.r.o. |
1 | 647,500 |
|
CASABLANCA INT a.s. |
1 | 599,040 |
|
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 555,000 |
|
Solutia, s.r.o. |
1 | 485,423 |
|
Mazel a partneři, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o. |
1 | 425,000 |
|
REINVEST spol. s r.o. |
1 | 287,500 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 10% (1 from 10) |
| Nonprice competition | 11% (2 from 18) |
| Division into lots | 6% (1 from 18) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 18) |
| Innovative procedure | 6% (1 from 18) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 10% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.70 |
| Average decision length | 68.75 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 5% (1 from 20) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Missing call for tenders | 5% (1 from 20) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Snížení energetické náročnosti na objektu KD Ládví, Praha 8 | Missing call for tenders |
| Pravidelná údržba ploch a veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 8 | Bidders count not published |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 89% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.28 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Rekonstrukce a nástavba budovy v užívání Městské policie hl. m. Prahy, na adrese Balabánova 1273/2, Praha 8 - Kobylisy | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Výstavba sportovního hřiště ZŠ b. Hrabala, Praha 8 | Tender not found on any profile |
| Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2021 a 2022 | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Technická podpora systémů ICZ e-spis a IS DESA | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Snížení energetické náročnosti na objektu KD Ládví, Praha 8 | Tender not found on any profile |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
