Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 8

IČO 00063797

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Úprava bezmotorové komunikace A2 a A26
Paths and other metalled surfaces
3
Ø4 in industry
Komunální služby Praha 8
Refuse and waste related services
3
Ø1 in industry
Pojištění movitého a nemovitého majetku, odpovědnosti za újmu pro MČ Praha 8 a její organizace
Insurance services
2
Ø2 in industry
Poskytování bezpečnostních služeb ve vybraných objektech ÚMČ Praha 8
Security services
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce a nástavba budovy v užívání Městské policie hl. m. Prahy, na adrese Balabánova 1273/2, Praha 8 - Kobylisy
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IPODEC - ČISTÉ MĚSTO a.s.
1 34,491,728
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 22,198,387
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s.
1 22,198,387
SCSA Security spol. s r.o.
2 21,715,944
BAB mont s.r.o.
1 18,692,222
Other suppliers 70 253,832,447

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 10% (1 from 10)
Nonprice competition 11% (2 from 18)
Division into lots 6% (1 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 6% (1 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (1 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.28 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 8 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 40 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.