Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 8

IČO 00063797

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování veřejně prospěšných (technických) služeb na území Městské části Praha 8 - Čistá osmička
Street-cleaning and sweeping services
4
Ø1 in industry
Komunální služby Praha 8
Refuse and waste related services
3
Ø2 in industry
Stavba podzemních kontejnerových stání na celém území městské části Praha 8 – II. etapa
Construction work for bridges and tunnels, shafts and subways
2
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace záznamového systému MKS „Bezpečná osmička“
Surveillance and security systems and devices
2
Ø2 in industry
Vybudování datové sítě pro Městskou část Praha 8
Network equipment
0
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav Alfa s.r.o.
2 1,263,798,910
IPODEC - ČISTÉ MĚSTO a.s.
5 95,976,476
Pražské služby, a.s.
2 58,013,062
Gardenline s.r.o.
4 56,251,188
BONAPART – GROUP, s. r. o.
1 23,072,787
Other suppliers 156 354,017,880

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (2 from 16)
Nonprice competition 28% (11 from 40)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 40)
E-auction 8% (3 from 40)
Innovative procedure 5% (2 from 40)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

0%
average 89%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

49%
average 64%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 44)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 44)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.05 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 43 tenders under the law)
0-250K 14 tenders
250K-500K 22 tenders
500K-1000K 28 tenders
1000K+ 77 tenders