Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 2

IČO 00063461

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

5.
ranking
79%
zIndex
Show average values  
71%
Bidder participation
98%
Winner concentration
46%
Pro-competitive tools
68%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
50%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
80%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Riegrovy sady - revitalizace parku nad ul. Vozová
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Sady Svatopluka Čecha - rekonstrukce vodního prvku
Paths and other metalled surfaces
2
Ø4 in industry
Folimanka - volnočasový areál pod Nuselským mostem
Restoration work
3
Ø4 in industry
Londýnská 16/537 - rekonstrukce prostoru jeslí v 1. PP, 1. NP - 3. NP
Restoration work
8
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Londýnská 34/782- výměna oken a oprava fasády
Restoration work
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Veolia Energie ČR, a.s.
 1 178,826,108
Prometheus, energetické služby, a.s., člen koncernu Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 1 164,845,222
KOMTERM Čechy, s.r.o.
 1 157,766,731
Gardenline s.r.o.
 3 66,976,481
Auböck s.r.o.
 1 45,972,160
Other suppliers 189 1,052,071,096

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

46%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 15% (4 from 27)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 27)
E-auction 0% (0 from 27)
Innovative procedure 4% (1 from 27)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71
Average decision length 91.67 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 29)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 29)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

80%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law)
0-250K 40 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 45 tenders
1000K+ 84 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.