Small cities • 2020

Městská část Praha 2

IČO 00063461

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

49.
ranking
72%
Zindex
Show average values  
71%
Bidder participation
75%
Winner concentration
47%
Pro-competitive tools
58%
Public procurement share on total purchases
70%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
50%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
74%
Buyer profile data quality

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Energetické služby a dodávky
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
ENERGETICKÉ SLUŽBY A DODÁVKY
Repair and maintenance services for pumps, valves, taps and metal containers and machinery
5
Ø2 in industry
Energetické služby a dodávky
Repair and maintenance services for pumps, valves, taps and metal containers and machinery
0
Ø2 in industry
ENERGETICKÉ SLUŽBY A DODÁVKY
Public utilities
5
Ø3 in industry
ENERGETICKÉ SLUŽBY A DODÁVKY
Public utilities
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KOMTERM Čechy, s.r.o.
 2 367,399,463
Veolia Energie ČR, a.s.
 2 240,159,441
Prometheus, energetické služby, a.s., člen koncernu Pražská plynárenská, a.s
 2 226,178,555
OFFICE-CENTRUM s.r.o.
 2 59,353,220
KyraStav spol. s r.o.
 2 44,599,132
Other suppliers 165 407,997,160

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

47%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (2 from 10)
Nonprice competition 21% (6 from 29)
Division into lots 7% (2 from 29)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 29)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 29)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vybudování zařízení pro poskytování péče o děti do 3 let v MČ Praha 2
Contract modification 		25,489,404 733,358 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50
Average decision length 119.30 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 30)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

74%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (zakázek z 30 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 30 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 21 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 8 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 52 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 66 zakázek