Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Valašské Meziříčí

IČO 00304387

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2

5.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
TQM-holding s.r.o.
1 178,218,240
PORR a.s.
4 74,593,614
aostav s.r.o.
4 35,912,359
EFIOS stavební s.r.o.
2 27,373,719
Mézl a Janíček s.r.o.
1 27,244,137
Other suppliers 62 495,122,423

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

33%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (2 from 8)
Nonprice competition 8% (3 from 39)
Division into lots 5% (2 from 39)
E-auction 0% (0 from 39)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 39)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 505,251,811
Small scale tenders 24,971,247
Unregulated purchases 900,113,139
Total 1,430,336,197

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy a zateplení objektu pro sociální bydlení ul. Jičínská č. p. 156, Valašské Meziříčí
Contract modification
9,563,992 1,956,569 (+21%)
Pěstební opatření pro Zámecký park, zámek Kinských, Krásno nad Bečvou, Valašské Meziříčí
Contract modification
1,536,709 230,499 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 43)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 43)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 43)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 43)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 43)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 43)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.16 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 43 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 6 tenders
500K-1000K 6 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.