Small cities • 2020

Město Valašské Meziříčí

IČO 00304387

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

35.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
1 66,989,048
ALPINE Bau CZ a.s.
5 42,877,438
Mézl a Janíček s.r.o.
1 27,244,139
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
1 23,960,149
aostav s.r.o.
1 21,181,393
Other suppliers 51 205,445,498

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 13% (6 from 45)
Division into lots 4% (2 from 45)
E-auction 0% (0 from 45)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 45)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 316,597,101
Small scale tenders 4,662,319
Unregulated purchases 1,035,709,869
Total 1,356,969,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Smuteční obřadní síň Valašské Meziříčí
Contract modification
23,960,149 3,859,233 (+17%)
Správa a provozování pohřebišť města Valašského Meziříčí
Contract modification
3,796,000 519,664 (+14%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 78.40 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 51)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 51)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 51)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 51)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 51)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 51)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

49%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 51 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders