Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kopřivnice

IČO 00298077

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Odkanalizování místních částí Vlčovice a Mniší
Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental services
7
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace centra města Kopřivnice III
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy domu s pečovatelskou službou - Masarykovo náměstí 650/11, Kopřivnice
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Úprava veřejných prostranství, příjezdová komunikace a parkovací plochy v okolí nového Technického muzea v Kopřivnici - 1. etapa
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
„Rekonstrukce TZB v objektech města Kopřivnice“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STASPO, spol. s r.o.
1 119,340,074
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 98,488,900
THERM, spol. s r.o.
5 47,337,813
HAMROZI s.r.o.
2 28,025,746
STRABAG a.s.
1 27,407,046
Other suppliers 154 465,959,915

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

36%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 11% (1 from 9)
Nonprice competition 17% (4 from 24)
Division into lots 8% (2 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 560,384,743
Small scale tenders 154,307,208
Unregulated purchases 606,976,074
Total 1,321,668,025

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Přeložka stávajícího vodovodního řadu v Kopřivnici, místní část Mniší vyvolaná stavbou kanalizace
Authorship rights
- 8,296,832
Odkanalizování místních částí Vlčovice a Mniší
Contract modification
119,340,074 4,642,329 (+4%)
Stavební úpravy domu s pečovatelskou službou - Masarykovo náměstí 650/11, Kopřivnice
Contract modification
28,430,174 2,237,042 (+8%)
Úprava veřejných prostranství, příjezdová komunikace a parkovací plochy v okolí nového Technického muzea v Kopřivnici - 1. etapa
Contract modification
27,407,046 1,989,570 (+8%)
DDM Kopřivnice - rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení včetně bezbariérové úpravy, elektroinstalace a rozvodů TZB
Contract modification
8,010,185 735,147 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00
Average decision length 79.25 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 59 tenders
250K-500K 29 tenders
500K-1000K 17 tenders
1000K+ 34 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.