Small cities • 2020

Město Kopřivnice

IČO 00298077

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

14.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Odkanalizování místních částí Vlčovice a Mniší
Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental services
7
Ø2 in industry
Úprava veřejných prostranství, příjezdová komunikace a parkovací plochy v okolí nového Technického muzea v Kopřivnici - 1. etapa
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní centrum Kopřivnice
Restoration work
4
Ø3 in industry
Celková rekonstrukce objektu vily v parku Ed. Beneše č.p. 243 v Kopřivnici
Restoration work
4
Ø3 in industry
„Rekonstrukce TZB v objektech města Kopřivnice“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STASPO, spol. s r.o.
1 119,340,074
THERM, spol. s r.o.
10 55,081,505
HAMROZI s.r.o.
2 28,025,746
STRABAG a.s.
1 27,407,046
BDSTAV MORAVA s.r.o.
1 26,988,140
Other suppliers 143 245,521,962

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 21% (3 from 14)
Nonprice competition 54% (20 from 37)
Division into lots 5% (2 from 37)
E-auction 0% (0 from 37)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 37)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 354,458,455
Small scale tenders 105,374,645
Unregulated purchases 721,073,591
Total 1,180,906,690

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Celková rekonstrukce objektu vily v parku Ed. Beneše č.p. 243 v Kopřivnici
Contract modification
22,798,282 3,205,925 (+15%)
Energetická opatření - Mateřská škola I.Šustaly
Contract modification
10,495,051 392,289 (+4%)
Úprava veřejných prostranství, příjezdová komunikace a parkovací plochy v okolí nového Technického muzea v Kopřivnici - 1. etapa
Contract modification
27,407,046 241,329 (+1%)
Komunitní centrum Kopřivnice
Contract modification
26,988,140 198,569 (+1%)
ZŠ a MŠ 17. listopadu - rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení
Contract modification
9,435,347 125,362 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

59%
average 64%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 37)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 37)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 37)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 37)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 37)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 37)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.83 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 35 tenders under the law)
0-250K 60 tenders
250K-500K 15 tenders
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 36 tenders