Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Žďár nad Sázavou

IČO 00295841

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

1.
ranking
84%
zIndex
Show average values  
54%
Bidder participation
90%
Winner concentration
71%
Pro-competitive tools
81%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
96%
Competitive contracting
80%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
81%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Rekonstrukce ulic ZR7 Žďár nad Sázavou, I., III. a IV. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro průmyslovou oblast Jamská II I. ETAPA, 1. část
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
1
Ø4 in industry
II/353 Žďár nad Sázavou - ul. Jihlavská
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry
Rozvoj cyklodopravy ve Žďáru nad Sázavou
Paths and other metalled surfaces
3
Ø4 in industry
Nádražní, Městská třída - část I - pěší zóna, Žďár nad Sázavou
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AQUASYS spol. s r.o.
 2 77,219,894
GREMIS, s.r.o.
 2 64,530,083
COLAS CZ, a.s.
 2 45,587,683
PKS stavby a.s.
 1 43,347,394
1.Žďárská plynařská a vodařská, a.s.
 2 33,453,950
Other suppliers 140 482,938,605

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

81%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 599,299,115
Small scale tenders 194,592,857
Unregulated purchases 416,840,062
Total 1,210,732,034

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rozvoj cyklodopravy ve Žďáru nad Sázavou
Contract modification 		25,345,000 3,308,201 (+14%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60
Average decision length 54.20 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

81%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 21 tenders
250K-500K 16 tenders
500K-1000K 37 tenders
1000K+ 42 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.