Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou

IČO 00289507

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Revitalizace ulic Stromořadní a Nová
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou - Propoj vodovodního přivaděče, rozšíření kanalizace a dešťová kanalizace ul. Ohrazenická
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Zástavba rodinných domů - Ohrazenická Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou Technická a dopravní infrastruktura
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Oprava komunikace a chodníků, parkoviště na ul. Zahradní - Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Oprava a odbahnění rybníka Vlčák
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SOBOS CZ spol. s r.o.
5 37,168,660
VHS plus, spol. s r.o.
1 10,651,372
TESMA Jaroměřice s.r.o.
9 9,806,389
Gstav Jaroměřice s. r. o.
4 9,067,350
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 6,901,014
Other suppliers 17 76,606,230

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 96,940,826
Small scale tenders 84,233,382
Unregulated purchases 63,192,738
Total 244,366,945

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.