Small cities • 2020

Město Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou

IČO 00289507

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. The competition for contracts is low.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce sportovního areálu Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Přestupní terminál Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Vybudování hasičské zbrojnice ve městě Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Construction work
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce oplocení sportovního areálu Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou a vybudování inline dráhy
Construction work
5
Ø3 in industry
Oprava komunikace a chodníků, parkoviště na ul. Zahradní - Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
1 25,299,806
SOBOS CZ spol. s r.o.
5 24,061,623
TESMA Jaroměřice s.r.o.
14 17,110,809
TOMIreko, s.r.o.
1 11,209,950
Ing. Bronislav Vala
1 10,244,942
Other suppliers 22 57,047,739

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce sportovního areálu Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou
Contract modification
25,299,806 2,688,629 (+11%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

50%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 69% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 20 tenders