Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Třebíč

IČO 00290629

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace Karlova náměstí v Třebíči
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Bytový dům na ulici Modřínová, Třebíč
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
LOKALITA „ZA POLIKLINIKOU“ komunikace a technická infrastruktura
Construction work for highways, roads
11
Ø5 in industry
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova, dopravní a technická infrastruktura - I. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
13
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Chelčického a Křižíkova v Třebíči - Borovině
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KLEE s.r.o.
24 118,760,820
SOBOS CZ spol. s r.o.
7 97,455,001
RONELI SE
1 61,944,981
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
1 51,356,381
COLAS CZ, a.s.
3 20,800,000
Other suppliers 212 524,481,471

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

18%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (1 from 13)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 30)
Division into lots 7% (2 from 30)
E-auction 3% (1 from 30)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 619,694,299
Small scale tenders 216,998,737
Unregulated purchases 1,249,063,649
Total 2,085,756,685

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace Karlova náměstí v Třebíči
Contract modification
133,400,000 11,866,257 (+9%)
LOKALITA „ZA POLIKLINIKOU“ komunikace a technická infrastruktura
Contract modification
51,356,381 6,531,902 (+13%)
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova, dopravní a technická infrastruktura - I. etapa
Contract modification
23,395,666 3,297,012 (+15%)
Bytový dům na ulici Modřínová, Třebíč
Contract modification
61,944,981 1,450,201 (+3%)
Obnova větrného mlýna v Třebíči
Contract modification
8,300,694 816,593 (+10%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 31)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 31)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

93%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.04 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 28 tenders under the law)
0-250K 14 tenders
250K-500K 65 tenders
500K-1000K 53 tenders
1000K+ 54 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.