Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Revitalizace Karlova náměstí v Třebíči
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Bytový dům na ulici Modřínová, Třebíč
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
LOKALITA „ZA POLIKLINIKOU“ komunikace a technická infrastruktura
Construction work for highways, roads |
11
Ø5 in industry |
|
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova, dopravní a technická infrastruktura - I. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads |
13
Ø5 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy ulice Chelčického a Křižíkova v Třebíči - Borovině
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
6
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
KLEE s.r.o. |
24 | 118,760,820 |
|
SOBOS CZ spol. s r.o. |
7 | 97,455,001 |
|
RONELI SE |
1 | 61,944,981 |
|
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o. |
1 | 51,356,381 |
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
3 | 20,800,000 |
| Other suppliers | 212 | 524,481,471 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
KLEE s.r.o. |
24 | 118,760,820 |
|
SOBOS CZ spol. s r.o. |
7 | 97,455,001 |
|
RONELI SE |
1 | 61,944,981 |
|
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o. |
1 | 51,356,381 |
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
3 | 20,800,000 |
|
RENO - stavební firma s.r.o. |
13 | 15,007,464 |
|
VESAS s.r.o. |
3 | 12,260,120 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 11,998,750 |
|
ARCHATT PAMÁTKY spol. s r.o. |
5 | 9,405,420 |
|
MALANG s.r.o. |
1 | 8,300,694 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
3 | 7,477,908 |
|
Colsys s.r.o. |
1 | 7,443,603 |
|
Zahrady Svoboda s.r.o. |
7 | 7,309,041 |
|
Ing. Ivo Herman, CSc. |
1 | 7,243,946 |
|
TREBILIFT, s.r.o. |
5 | 6,890,801 |
|
MOBIKO plus a.s. |
3 | 6,014,728 |
|
Elektro - ing.Klíma s.r.o. |
2 | 5,873,229 |
|
KAVYL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 5,504,669 |
|
DECOLED s.r.o. |
5 | 4,641,793 |
|
Lesprojekt východní Čechy, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,617,000 |
|
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
1 | 4,285,000 |
|
FITNEMA s.r.o. |
1 | 4,064,593 |
|
KASKA s.r.o. |
1 | 3,966,387 |
|
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
3 | 3,693,470 |
|
GEONET CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 3,484,163 |
|
AQUA PROCON s.r.o. |
4 | 3,442,675 |
|
PATRIOT, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 3,421,564 |
|
H & B delta, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,773,000 |
|
Ekosvětlo s.r.o. |
1 | 2,646,199 |
|
CARETTA SPA CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,402,888 |
|
ESTING GROUP s.r.o. |
2 | 2,383,538 |
|
SOFI stav, s.r.o. |
2 | 2,245,846 |
|
Muzeum Vysočiny Jihlava, příspěvková organizace |
1 | 1,990,000 |
|
C SYSTEM CZ a.s. |
1 | 1,979,200 |
|
VESTAV group s.r.o. |
1 | 1,958,316 |
|
ATELIER RAW s.r.o. |
1 | 1,950,000 |
|
atelier Fabík s.r.o. |
3 | 1,928,000 |
|
VERA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,890,000 |
|
BINI Jihlava s.r.o. |
1 | 1,868,500 |
|
DIS projekt s.r.o. |
3 | 1,849,300 |
|
DAITE s.r.o. |
1 | 1,837,565 |
|
Jaromír Mareš |
1 | 1,800,000 |
|
TOMIreko, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,760,040 |
|
Stavební firma Hádlík s.r.o. |
3 | 1,641,230 |
|
VMS projekt s.r.o. |
2 | 1,557,200 |
|
Ing. Michal Rak |
2 | 1,409,200 |
|
YASHICA s.r.o. |
1 | 1,278,200 |
|
NDCON s.r.o. |
1 | 1,249,000 |
|
VSM, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,243,906 |
|
In-stav spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,171,788 |
|
Bohuslav Klee |
2 | 1,161,557 |
|
HR Elektro s.r.o. |
2 | 1,098,496 |
|
Jiří Kovář - ELKOWE |
1 | 1,062,671 |
|
HOKO-VH s.r.o. |
1 | 969,750 |
|
Josef Pejchal |
3 | 964,361 |
|
VYMYSLICKÝ - VÝTAHY spol. s r.o. |
1 | 949,100 |
|
RESPOND & CO, s.r.o. |
2 | 920,000 |
|
FT Technologies a.s. |
1 | 915,984 |
|
MSV vzduchotechnika, spol. s.r.o. |
1 | 864,270 |
|
NISASPORT-ELEKTRONIK společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 859,650 |
|
Ing. arch. Petr Todorov |
2 | 828,972 |
|
Scenario s.r.o. |
1 | 827,400 |
|
SVIPP, s.r.o. |
1 | 826,630 |
|
SHB, akciová společnost |
1 | 807,100 |
|
MgA. Tea Smetanová |
1 | 800,000 |
|
VIAVIS a.s. |
1 | 772,562 |
|
Stanislav Kratochvíl |
2 | 752,196 |
|
Plán projekt Kapucín, s.r.o. |
2 | 752,000 |
|
Dopravně inženýrská kancelář, s.r.o. |
1 | 743,000 |
|
ALEF NULA,a.s. |
1 | 741,281 |
|
TIPA Telekom plus a.s. |
1 | 723,398 |
|
PERFECTED s.r.o. |
1 | 687,173 |
|
MATULA projekt s. r. o. |
1 | 659,000 |
|
Josef Vostal |
1 | 654,248 |
|
Podlahy Škárka s.r.o. |
3 | 646,967 |
|
H.A.N.S. stavby, a.s. |
1 | 630,000 |
|
Trojanová Lenka |
1 | 617,744 |
|
Agumont, s.r.o. |
1 | 612,759 |
|
ARCDATA PRAHA, s.r.o. |
1 | 600,000 |
|
Agral Plast, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 579,890 |
|
PONTONY s.r.o. |
1 | 572,400 |
|
Pavel Vídenský |
1 | 565,599 |
|
OMEXOM GA Energo s.r.o. |
2 | 551,068 |
|
3K realizace s.r.o. |
1 | 544,671 |
|
L.N.O., s.r.o. |
1 | 522,717 |
|
JaR DIGITAL group s.r.o. |
1 | 520,088 |
|
Vodáček Jan, Mgr. |
1 | 498,100 |
|
Ing. Tomáš Dvořák |
1 | 494,446 |
|
VIPA project, s.r.o. |
1 | 489,000 |
|
3 Tech., s.r.o. |
1 | 486,936 |
|
K-TOP,s.r.o. |
1 | 479,377 |
|
PS studio s.r.o. |
1 | 470,000 |
|
Ávila Herrera Ivalú Macarena |
1 | 465,000 |
|
HS AUTOMOBIL s.r.o. |
1 | 464,352 |
|
Peštál, s.r.o. |
1 | 457,788 |
|
Ing. Luděk Budík |
1 | 440,000 |
|
Ing.arch. Petr Brožek |
1 | 400,000 |
|
A.M.O.S. DESIGN s.r.o. |
1 | 387,750 |
|
YNOYWOD s.r.o. |
1 | 373,925 |
|
DYNEX TECHNOLOGIES, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 370,500 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. zkráceně VRV a.s. |
1 | 348,000 |
|
atelier H3T architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 335,000 |
|
A-Z Reklama CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 324,864 |
|
ZO Českého svazu ochránců přírody Kněžice |
1 | 321,500 |
|
VYZNAč, s.r.o. |
1 | 321,484 |
|
ZMES, s. r. o. |
1 | 321,040 |
|
ANECT a.s. |
1 | 320,189 |
|
CI2, o. p. s. |
1 | 314,500 |
|
JIRI DRASAR, A.S. |
1 | 310,656 |
|
GORDIC spol. s r.o. |
1 | 305,300 |
|
SmartPlan s.r.o. |
1 | 300,000 |
|
Josef Mezlík |
1 | 299,810 |
|
Havel Zdeněk, Ing. |
1 | 296,693 |
|
Bořivoj Šťáva |
1 | 295,250 |
|
DHV PRO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 288,000 |
|
Ing. Petr Velička |
1 | 270,000 |
|
Ing. Jindřich Bednář |
1 | 264,980 |
|
Vysplan s.r.o. |
1 | 246,000 |
|
Okna&Company, s.r.o. |
1 | 245,980 |
|
ACARS s. r. o. |
1 | 245,000 |
|
Linio Plan, s.r.o. |
1 | 238,600 |
|
Ing. Jiří Hnízdil |
1 | 232,870 |
|
Ing. Jiří Dvořák |
1 | 218,500 |
|
M + R stavební, s.r.o. |
1 | 206,276 |
|
AV MEDIA SYSTEMS, a.s. |
1 | 203,080 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 8% (1 from 13) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Division into lots | 7% (2 from 30) |
| E-auction | 3% (1 from 30) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 30) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 619,694,299 |
| Small scale tenders | 216,998,737 |
| Unregulated purchases | 1,249,063,649 |
| Total | 2,085,756,685 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 776,419,634 |
| Material consumption | 35,883,604 |
| Energy consumption | 61,181,730 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 840,670 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 41,959 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 338,861,516 |
| Travel costs | 1,235,858 |
| Representation costs | 2,465,726 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 589,527,893 |
| Small long-term property costs | 32,385,918 |
| Other costs | 246,912,176 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
| Name | Misconduct |
|---|---|
| Preference městské hromadné dopravy města Třebíč – Křižovatky | NO |
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Revitalizace Karlova náměstí v Třebíči Contract modification |
133,400,000 | 11,866,257 (+9%) |
|
LOKALITA „ZA POLIKLINIKOU“ komunikace a technická infrastruktura Contract modification |
51,356,381 | 6,531,902 (+13%) |
|
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova, dopravní a technická infrastruktura - I. etapa Contract modification |
23,395,666 | 3,297,012 (+15%) |
|
Bytový dům na ulici Modřínová, Třebíč Contract modification |
61,944,981 | 1,450,201 (+3%) |
|
Obnova větrného mlýna v Třebíči Contract modification |
8,300,694 | 816,593 (+10%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Revitalizace Karlova náměstí v Třebíči Contract modification |
133,400,000 | 11,866,257 (+9%) |
|
LOKALITA „ZA POLIKLINIKOU“ komunikace a technická infrastruktura Contract modification |
51,356,381 | 6,531,902 (+13%) |
|
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova, dopravní a technická infrastruktura - I. etapa Contract modification |
23,395,666 | 3,297,012 (+15%) |
|
Bytový dům na ulici Modřínová, Třebíč Contract modification |
61,944,981 | 1,450,201 (+3%) |
|
Obnova větrného mlýna v Třebíči Contract modification |
8,300,694 | 816,593 (+10%) |
|
Třebíč - průmyslová zóna sever - Rafaelova - II. etapa, okružní křižovatka Contract modification |
8,022,264 | 589,193 (+8%) |
|
Třebíč, Říční lázně Polanka, celková oprava budovy s převlékárnami, 4. - 6. etapa Contract modification |
7,189,420 | 463,624 (+7%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 8% |
| Cancelled contracts | 23% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.92 |
| Average decision length | 85.17 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 31) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 31) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.04 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 28 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Správa bytového fondu, nebytových prostor a ubytovny ve vlastnictví města Třebíče | Paid price does strongly differ from contracted price (including amendments) |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
