Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile has high number of errors.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Provozování městské autobusové hromadné dopravy v Břeclavi v letech 2021-2031
Road transport services |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Přístavba domova seniorů Břeclav - kuchyně
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
ZŠ Břeclav Poštorná, Komenského 502/14, bílá škola 1. stupeň odborné učebny a výtah
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
„CYKLOSTEZKA UL. BRATISLAVSKÁ - UL. NA ZAHRADÁCH ÚSEK III – I. ČÁST“, „REKONSTRUKCE VEŘEJNÉHO OSVĚTLENÍ NA ULICI BRATISLAVSKÉ V BŘECLAVI „, „BŘECLAV - UL. MLÁDEŽNICKÁ, KOMUNIKACE, CHODNÍK A PODÉLNÉ ST
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
PD - Domov seniorů Břeclav
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services |
5
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
BORS Břeclav a.s. |
2 | 393,819,000 |
|
VW WACHAL a.s. |
1 | 43,416,448 |
|
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s. |
1 | 43,416,448 |
|
SBD, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 18,510,723 |
|
VHS Břeclav s.r.o. |
1 | 11,449,886 |
| Other suppliers | 17 | 162,691,716 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
BORS Břeclav a.s. |
2 | 393,819,000 |
|
VW WACHAL a.s. |
1 | 43,416,448 |
|
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s. |
1 | 43,416,448 |
|
SBD, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 18,510,723 |
|
VHS Břeclav s.r.o. |
1 | 11,449,886 |
|
HUTNÍ PROJEKT Frýdek-Místek a.s. |
2 | 9,700,000 |
|
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o. |
2 | 9,374,500 |
|
LIVINGSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 8,495,000 |
|
sport cité + s.r.o. |
1 | 7,637,495 |
|
P.P. Architects s.r.o. |
1 | 7,500,000 |
|
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o. |
1 | 5,488,355 |
|
Allianz pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 5,100,000 |
|
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 3,293,683 |
|
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,061,404 |
|
REMOV Sport, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,021,505 |
|
Alpiq Retail CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,973,513 |
|
4TECHS CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,382,376 |
|
OPTICZECH s.r.o. |
2 | 2,382,376 |
|
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,088,112 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 25% (1 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 17% (4 from 24) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 24) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Innovative procedure | 4% (1 from 24) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 780,610,491 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 515,012,324 |
| Total | 1,295,622,815 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 514,472,496 |
| Material consumption | 41,447,306 |
| Energy consumption | 49,194,443 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 0 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 212,594,344 |
| Travel costs | 2,571,561 |
| Representation costs | 2,159,600 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 429,064,318 |
| Small long-term property costs | 31,127,147 |
| Other costs | 12,991,600 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Dočasné zajištění dopravní obslužnosti Města Břeclavi veřejnou linkovou dopravou Emergency |
- | 19,899,000 |
|
PD - Rekonstrukce městského koupaliště v Břeclavi Previous tender without bids |
- | 4,800,000 |
|
ZŠ Břeclav, Kpt. Nálepky 7 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže Contract modification |
1,837,565 | 281,204 (+16%) |
|
ZŠ Břeclav, Komenského 2 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže Contract modification |
2,927,186 | 118,362 (+5%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Dočasné zajištění dopravní obslužnosti Města Břeclavi veřejnou linkovou dopravou Emergency |
- | 19,899,000 |
|
PD - Rekonstrukce městského koupaliště v Břeclavi Previous tender without bids |
- | 4,800,000 |
|
ZŠ Břeclav, Kpt. Nálepky 7 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže Contract modification |
1,837,565 | 281,204 (+16%) |
|
ZŠ Břeclav, Komenského 2 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže Contract modification |
2,927,186 | 118,362 (+5%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 20% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.20 |
| Average decision length | 164.50 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC v objektech města Břeclav | 0 | 402 | ||
| PD - Domov seniorů Břeclav | 1 | 22 | ||
| Pořízení kompostérů a kontejnerů na textil v rámci projektu Břeclav kompostuje! | 1 | 94 | ||
| Úpravy veřejného prostranství s víceúrovňovým parkováním, Břeclav | 0 | > 180 | ||
| Provozování městské autobusové hromadné dopravy v Břeclavi v letech 2021-2031 | 4 | 140 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 28) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 28) |
| Missing buyer ID | 7% (2 from 28) |
| Missing call for tenders | 4% (1 from 28) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 28) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 28) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Pojištění města Břeclavi | Missing buyer ID, Missing call for tenders |
| PD - Domov seniorů Břeclav | Missing buyer ID |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 0% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 26 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
