Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Břeclav

IČO 00283061

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BORS Břeclav a.s.
2 393,819,000
VW WACHAL a.s.
1 43,416,448
VÁHOSTAV - SK, a.s.
1 43,416,448
SBD, spol. s r.o.
1 18,510,723
VHS Břeclav s.r.o.
1 11,449,886
Other suppliers 17 162,691,716

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 17% (4 from 24)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 4% (1 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

78%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 780,610,491
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 515,012,324
Total 1,295,622,815

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dočasné zajištění dopravní obslužnosti Města Břeclavi veřejnou linkovou dopravou
Emergency
- 19,899,000
PD - Rekonstrukce městského koupaliště v Břeclavi
Previous tender without bids
- 4,800,000
ZŠ Břeclav, Kpt. Nálepky 7 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže
Contract modification
1,837,565 281,204 (+16%)
ZŠ Břeclav, Komenského 2 - objektové rozvody strukturované kabeláže
Contract modification
2,927,186 118,362 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

30%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20
Average decision length 164.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 7% (2 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 28)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 28)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 26 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.