Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Chotěboř

IČO 00267538

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zimní stadion – dostavba zázemí pod tribunou
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Nová infrastruktura IT pro zajištění kybernetické bezpečnosti v čp. 69, Trčků z Lípy, Chotěboř včetně silnoproudých rozvodů
Networks
3
Ø2 in industry
Kino Chotěboř č.p. 256, zázemí pro účinkující
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace Sladovnická, Klášterní a vybudování prostranství před ZŠ Buttulova
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
6
Ø2 in industry
Náměstí T.G. Masaryka v Chotěboři
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
7 41,711,467
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
1 33,174,092
NODEL s.r.o.
1 18,865,280
DMC Brno s.r.o.
1 17,143,596
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
3 16,227,345
Other suppliers 59 224,544,016

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 124,343,150
Small scale tenders 167,382,169
Unregulated purchases 393,750,102
Total 685,475,420

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 33 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.