Small cities • 2020

Město Chotěboř

IČO 00267538

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

62.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zimní stadion – dostavba zázemí pod tribunou
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Nová infrastruktura IT pro zajištění kybernetické bezpečnosti v čp. 69, Trčků z Lípy, Chotěboř včetně silnoproudých rozvodů
Local area network
3
Ø2 in industry
Skládka TKO Chotěboř - Lapíkov IV. etapa a částečná rekultivace III.etapy skládky
Engineering works and construction works
4
Ø4 in industry
Kino Chotěboř č.p. 256, zázemí pro účinkující
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Náměstí T.G. Masaryka v Chotěboři
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
1 33,174,092
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
7 28,247,285
NODEL s.r.o.
1 18,865,280
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
2 18,309,521
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
1 18,200,000
Other suppliers 59 123,019,961

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 111,711,880
Small scale tenders 119,537,977
Unregulated purchases 352,143,089
Total 583,392,945

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders