Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Havlíčkův Brod

IČO 00267449

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

12.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek a Tintěra Havlíčkův Brod, a.s.
11 84,877,106
RONELI SE
3 68,825,540
M-SILNICE a.s.
6 40,825,602
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 33,869,800
Dvořáková - stavební firma s.r.o.
6 15,705,718
Other suppliers 107 405,099,951

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

59%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 62% (5 from 8)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 27)
Division into lots 33% (9 from 27)
E-auction 19% (5 from 27)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 27)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

86%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 633,898,089
Small scale tenders 95,292,220
Unregulated purchases 248,078,396
Total 977,268,705

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 25 tenders under the law)
0-250K 8 tenders
250K-500K 14 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 37 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.