Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce Jiráskova divadla v České Lípě, Panská 219 - stavební práce a dodávka vybavení interiéru
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Šluknovská čp. 2904 - realizace stavby
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Azylový dům města Česká Lípa
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Regenerace sídliště Špičák - parkoviště v ul. Vladimírská
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dostavba ZŠ speciální Jižní, Česká Lípa - demolice a novostavba pavilonu F"
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 132,923,004 |
|
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s. |
1 | 71,711,000 |
|
VERSANA s.r.o. |
9 | 60,189,058 |
|
BLÁHA trade s.r.o. |
1 | 23,244,000 |
|
ALPIQ ENERGY SE |
2 | 20,842,256 |
| Other suppliers | 169 | 511,068,634 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 132,923,004 |
|
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s. |
1 | 71,711,000 |
|
VERSANA s.r.o. |
9 | 60,189,058 |
|
BLÁHA trade s.r.o. |
1 | 23,244,000 |
|
ALPIQ ENERGY SE |
2 | 20,842,256 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 17,890,000 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
4 | 12,299,056 |
|
E.ON Energie, a.s. |
2 | 8,151,270 |
|
MARHOLD a.s. |
1 | 7,213,336 |
|
DigiTry Art Technologies s.r.o. |
1 | 7,093,000 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 6,923,740 |
|
PSD s.r.o. |
2 | 6,668,910 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 6,023,565 |
|
Česká pošta, s.p. |
1 | 6,000,000 |
|
M2AU s.r.o. |
2 | 5,827,333 |
|
AWEA s.r.o. |
2 | 5,639,415 |
|
MEGA a.s. |
1 | 4,150,966 |
|
Milan Szabo |
3 | 3,952,631 |
|
Adam Rujbr Architects s.r.o. |
1 | 3,920,000 |
|
Ing. arch.Jiří Kňákal |
1 | 3,829,250 |
|
SaM silnice a mosty a.s. |
1 | 3,739,694 |
|
Mandant spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,401,000 |
|
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
3 | 3,380,968 |
|
TT Ice-snow s.r.o. |
1 | 3,300,000 |
|
CENTROPROJEKT GROUP a.s. |
1 | 2,995,000 |
|
ZEPS s.r.o. |
1 | 2,954,269 |
|
HANTYCH s.r.o. |
2 | 2,850,255 |
|
RAVRcz, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,800,911 |
|
COR INTERIORS s.r.o. |
1 | 2,793,704 |
|
ULIMEX, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,738,941 |
|
OPRAVY PAMÁTEK - Kabáč s.r.o. |
1 | 2,725,404 |
|
VÝTAHY VANĚRKA s.r.o. |
1 | 2,677,750 |
|
Otto Žítek - elektro-osvětlení ELOS |
2 | 2,647,735 |
|
INT-EX, s.r.o. |
2 | 2,574,230 |
|
BÜROPROFI s.r.o. |
12 | 2,487,365 |
|
STREET s.r.o. |
1 | 2,392,000 |
|
MIDAKON s.r.o. |
2 | 2,356,000 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
2 | 2,309,924 |
|
TECHNISERV IT, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,277,600 |
|
OTISTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 2,272,698 |
|
RKK, s.r.o. |
7 | 2,234,590 |
|
David Blažej |
1 | 2,150,275 |
|
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,096,600 |
|
TV Facility Group, a.s. |
2 | 1,988,335 |
|
ELA-PLAST s.r.o. |
3 | 1,962,569 |
|
Rychlé stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 1,794,107 |
|
MISTAV-CL s.r.o. |
1 | 1,685,155 |
|
SKJ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,630,449 |
|
SITEL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,572,942 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. zkráceně VRV a.s. |
1 | 1,495,000 |
|
Lumius, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,478,796 |
|
DC AVEX s.r.o. |
1 | 1,393,000 |
|
ALESTRA s.r.o. |
5 | 1,304,678 |
|
ADVISIA s.r.o. |
2 | 1,213,000 |
|
awin IT, s. r. o. |
1 | 1,198,506 |
|
KL-PLAN s.r.o. |
1 | 1,144,010 |
|
COMPAG CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 985,740 |
|
Inženýring staveb s.r.o. |
2 | 895,864 |
|
AA OKNA DVEŘE s.r.o. |
1 | 894,690 |
|
Porsche Inter Auto CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 881,771 |
|
Probo-NB, s.r.o. |
7 | 858,909 |
|
JEZBERA A SYN v.o.s. |
1 | 805,476 |
|
COLMEX s.r.o. |
1 | 798,122 |
|
U / U Studio |
1 | 773,000 |
|
Projektová kancelář VANER s.r.o. |
1 | 750,350 |
|
AŽD Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 749,700 |
|
V A R I A s.r.o. - inženýrská činnost a provádění staveb |
1 | 720,000 |
|
OKNOSTYL group s.r.o. |
1 | 683,772 |
|
MĚŠŤÁK-SEVER s.r.o. |
1 | 667,536 |
|
ANTISTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 631,966 |
|
ASPEKTA Trading, s.r.o. |
1 | 615,870 |
|
MOBA studio s.r.o. |
1 | 615,000 |
|
SmartPlan s.r.o. |
1 | 595,959 |
|
SUDOP PRAHA a.s. |
1 | 594,534 |
|
R3STAV s.r.o. |
1 | 575,870 |
|
MCA atelier s.r.o. |
1 | 575,000 |
|
MUNIPOLIS s.r.o. |
1 | 504,320 |
|
DATRON, a.s. |
1 | 499,930 |
|
DESIGN 4 - projekty staveb, s.r.o. |
1 | 495,000 |
|
Ing. Hynek Seiner |
1 | 493,000 |
|
Silnice Žáček s.r.o. |
1 | 428,451 |
|
PB SCOM s.r.o. |
1 | 419,744 |
|
Ivan Pergler |
1 | 413,000 |
|
FLORA SERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 402,378 |
|
OFFICE DEPOT s.r.o. |
2 | 389,311 |
|
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 388,988 |
|
Ing. arch. Tomáš Beneš |
2 | 388,000 |
|
Nextis Services s.r.o. |
1 | 379,700 |
|
Boxline system s.r.o. |
1 | 363,260 |
|
HORTECH control s.r.o. |
2 | 355,950 |
|
TELMO a.s. |
1 | 353,640 |
|
SANTAL spol. s r. o. |
1 | 331,200 |
|
ELGO CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 311,124 |
|
Ludvík Nesnídal |
1 | 299,900 |
|
Projekční atelier pro dokumentaci, průzkum a obnovu historických staveb s.r.o. |
1 | 264,000 |
|
IPR Aqua s.r.o. |
1 | 245,560 |
|
Rehwaldt Landscape Architects |
1 | 233,333 |
|
ING.ARCH. HELENA HLAVKOVA |
1 | 233,333 |
|
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o. |
10 | 224,806 |
|
DOKOM FINAL s.r.o. |
1 | 190,064 |
|
KECIP, s.r.o. |
1 | 144,620 |
|
H.A.N.S. stavby, a.s. |
1 | 111,000 |
|
GS PLUS s.r.o. |
1 | 106,672 |
|
Avízo s.r.o. |
2 | 86,789 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 12% (2 from 16) |
| Nonprice competition | 19% (8 from 42) |
| Division into lots | 21% (9 from 42) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Innovative procedure | 2% (1 from 42) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 750,266,794 |
| Small scale tenders | 170,014,076 |
| Unregulated purchases | 1,011,634,535 |
| Total | 1,931,915,405 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 694,249,314 |
| Material consumption | 39,801,372 |
| Energy consumption | 45,133,816 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 586,329 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 253,272,186 |
| Travel costs | 1,524,646 |
| Representation costs | 2,730,647 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 622,404,109 |
| Small long-term property costs | 34,797,938 |
| Other costs | 237,415,048 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce Jiráskova divadla v České Lípě, Panská 219 - stavební práce a dodávka vybavení interiéru Contract modification |
132,923,004 | 18,862,472 (+15%) |
|
Poskytování poštovních služeb Technical exclusivity |
- | 6,000,000 |
|
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 2983 U Synagogy, Česká Lípa - projektová dokumentace Technical exclusivity |
- | 3,829,250 |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Šluknovská čp. 2904 - realizace stavby Contract modification |
71,711,000 | 3,779,278 (+6%) |
|
Kounicův dům, Berkova 100, Česká Lípa - nutné zabezpečovací práce Contract modification |
6,369,007 | 1,187,981 (+19%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 24% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.24 |
| Average decision length | 102.19 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 4% (2 from 51) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 51) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 51) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 51) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 51) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 2% (1 from 51) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Modernizace odborných učeben ZŠ Šluknovská | Bidders count not published |
| Modernizace odborných učeben ZŠ Antonína Sovy | Bidders count not published, Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.35 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 48 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
