Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Česká Lípa

IČO 00260428

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 132,923,004
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
1 71,711,000
VERSANA s.r.o.
9 60,189,058
BLÁHA trade s.r.o.
1 23,244,000
ALPIQ ENERGY SE
2 20,842,256
Other suppliers 169 511,068,634

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

56%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (2 from 16)
Nonprice competition 19% (8 from 42)
Division into lots 21% (9 from 42)
E-auction 0% (0 from 42)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 42)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 750,266,794
Small scale tenders 170,014,076
Unregulated purchases 1,011,634,535
Total 1,931,915,405

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce Jiráskova divadla v České Lípě, Panská 219 - stavební práce a dodávka vybavení interiéru
Contract modification
132,923,004 18,862,472 (+15%)
Poskytování poštovních služeb
Technical exclusivity
- 6,000,000
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 2983 U Synagogy, Česká Lípa - projektová dokumentace
Technical exclusivity
- 3,829,250
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Šluknovská čp. 2904 - realizace stavby
Contract modification
71,711,000 3,779,278 (+6%)
Kounicův dům, Berkova 100, Česká Lípa - nutné zabezpečovací práce
Contract modification
6,369,007 1,187,981 (+19%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 24%
Average requirements modifications count 1.24
Average decision length 102.19 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (2 from 51)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 51)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 51)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 51)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 51)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 51)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.35 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 48 tenders under the law)
0-250K 5 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 22 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.