Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Strakonice

IČO 00251810

Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Bezbariérová trasa DPS - MěKs Strakonice
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
DŮM KULTURY STRAKONICE – I. ETAPA
Restoration work
3
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní centrum Strakonice
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Plavecký stadion Strakonice - náprava havarijního stavu zastřešení bazénové haly
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Modernizace a rozšíření varovného a informačního systému města Strakonice
Flood-prevention works
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ZNAKON, a.s.
2 55,008,596
KOČÍ a.s.
1 45,849,372
ACG-Real s.r.o.
1 18,873,287
PRIMA, akciová společnost
2 16,490,974
Colsys s.r.o.
1 11,035,969
Other suppliers 11 107,715,097

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

57%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 279,036,971
Small scale tenders 12,887,907
Unregulated purchases 937,709,104
Total 1,229,633,983

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Plavecký stadion Strakonice - náprava havarijního stavu zastřešení bazénové haly
Contract modification
14,914,914 6,690,940 (+45%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.31 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.