Small cities • 2020

Město Strakonice

IČO 00251810

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
DŮM KULTURY STRAKONICE – I. ETAPA
Restoration work
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Šv. Dudáka, Strakonice
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Rozvoj informačních a komunikačních systémů města Strakonice, registrační číslo projektu: CZ.06.3.05/0.0/0.0/16_044/0005175 - část A
Software package and information systems
1
Ø1 in industry
Parkoviště Beranův dvůr, Strakonice
Construction work for highways, roads
6
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Poděbradova, Strakonice
Construction work
11
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KOČÍ a.s.
1 45,849,372
ZNAKON, a.s.
1 32,479,938
Technologické centrum Písek s.r.o.
1 20,117,904
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
2 19,201,924
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o.
1 16,917,900
Other suppliers 18 55,175,551

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 187,057,840
Small scale tenders 13,011,597
Unregulated purchases 910,543,524
Total 1,110,612,960

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20
Average decision length 43.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 36% (5 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.23 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 6 tenders