Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Trhové Sviny

IČO 00245551

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
GENERÁLNÍ OPRAVA KOHLBACH K83500 HTK MĚSTO TRHOVÉ SVINY
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
1
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy kuchyně a jídelny Základní škola Trhové Sviny
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
ÚV Otěvěk, Trhové Sviny obnova a doplnění technologie
Sewer construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Kanalizace + vodovod Svatá Trojice
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Trhové Sviny vystrojení a připojení vrtů Nežetice, Hrádek a Březí
Construction works for sewage treatment plants, purification plants and refuse incineration plants
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SMP CZ, a.s.
2 36,638,810
ENESA a.s.
1 35,134,820
Auböck s.r.o.
1 32,347,322
Stavitelství Matourek s.r.o. dopravní a inženýrské stavby
1 18,787,380
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 7,865,600
Other suppliers 1 7,865,600

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 92,513,401
Small scale tenders 13,020,627
Unregulated purchases 217,203,594
Total 322,737,623

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

12%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.86 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.