Small cities • 2020

Město Trhové Sviny

IČO 00245551

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení emisí výtopny na biomasu v Trhových Svinech
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø2 in industry
Školní ulice Trhové Sviny
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Nové funkce IS města Trhové Sviny, II - (a) Část 1 – Nové funkce elektronické spisové služby, IS ekonomických agend a IS registrových agend
Information systems
1
Ø1 in industry
Nové funkce IS města Trhové Sviny - (b) Část 2 – Řízení a vyhodnocování projektů
Information systems and servers
0
Ø1 in industry
Nové funkce IS města Trhové Sviny - Rozšíření serverové, datové a komunikační infrastruktury
Information systems
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Schiestl spol. s r.o.
1 6,276,500
Stavitelství Matourek s.r.o. dopravní a inženýrské stavby
1 5,734,439
GORDIC spol. s r.o.
1 5,147,623
AV MEDIA, a.s.
3 2,263,949
TranSoft a.s.
1 1,764,050
Other suppliers 5 3,519,832

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 60% (3 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

30%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 9,987,843
Small scale tenders 13,020,627
Unregulated purchases 229,084,059
Total 252,092,530

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 20% (1 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.80 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 5 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 3 tenders