Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 10

IČO 00063941

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba mateřské školy v ulici Bajkalská, Praha 10
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 10 - Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 10 - oblast Vršovice
Agricultural, forestry, horticultural, aquacultural and apicultural services
2
Ø4 in industry
Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 10 - Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 10 - oblast Záběhlice
Agricultural, forestry, horticultural, aquacultural and apicultural services
4
Ø4 in industry
Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně na území MČ Praha 10 - Správa a údržba ploch veřejné zeleně - oblast Malešice
Agricultural, forestry, horticultural, aquacultural and apicultural services
4
Ø4 in industry
Energetická úspora ZŠ Olešská II
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
2 97,497,842
VISTORIA CZ a.s.
2 90,952,416
CEBU service s.r.o.
2 68,493,116
V-TRADE, s.r.o.
2 68,493,116
Ironex MB s.r.o.
2 68,493,116
Other suppliers 117 786,893,273

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 11)
Nonprice competition 18% (6 from 34)
Division into lots 6% (2 from 34)
E-auction 0% (0 from 34)
Innovative procedure 6% (2 from 34)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 66%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zpracování projektové dokumentace pro akci: Rekonstrukce radnice městské části Praha 10
Contract modification
44,100,000 14,423,000 (+33%)
Energetická úspora ZŠ Olešská II
Contract modification
49,846,271 13,994,338 (+29%)
Výstavba mateřské školy v ulici Bajkalská, Praha 10
Contract modification
128,926,467 5,181,549 (+5%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 36)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 36)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 36)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 36)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 36)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 3% (1 from 36)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

59%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.61 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 33 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 12 tenders
500K-1000K 19 tenders
1000K+ 48 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.