Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce polikliniky Malešice
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
„Rekonstrukce objektu U Vršovického nádraží 30/30 na komunitní centrum Praha 10“
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Novostavba MŠ v areálu ZŠ Nad Vodovodem 460/81, k.ú. Malešice – Praha 10
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Zpracování projektové dokumentace komplexní opravy a rekonstrukce objektu ÚMČ Praha 10
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
„Správa domovního fondu svěřeného m.č. Praha 10“
Real estate services |
0
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
S u b t e r r a a.s. |
3 | 287,093,906 |
|
VISTORIA CZ a.s. |
3 | 154,562,332 |
|
EDIKT a.s. |
2 | 63,315,016 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
2 | 51,535,225 |
|
CASUA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 44,100,000 |
| Other suppliers | 65 | 300,731,075 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
S u b t e r r a a.s. |
3 | 287,093,906 |
|
VISTORIA CZ a.s. |
3 | 154,562,332 |
|
EDIKT a.s. |
2 | 63,315,016 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
2 | 51,535,225 |
|
CASUA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 44,100,000 |
|
MARHOLD a.s. |
1 | 20,897,613 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 20,488,283 |
|
KVS stavební, s.r.o. |
2 | 16,102,762 |
|
JOPO CONSTRUCTIONS a.s. |
1 | 14,950,102 |
|
SGS Czech Republic, s.r.o. |
3 | 14,858,160 |
|
SAMSON PRAHA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 13,435,000 |
|
FA: JANPE s.r.o. |
2 | 11,833,745 |
|
EL-EX spol. s r.o. |
3 | 11,534,420 |
|
SUNCAD, s.r.o. |
3 | 11,364,000 |
|
D-PLUS PROJEKTOVÁ A INŽENÝRSKÁ a.s. |
4 | 10,551,700 |
|
B&P INTERIÉRY s.r.o. |
1 | 9,740,000 |
|
OFFICE-CENTRUM s.r.o. |
1 | 9,587,700 |
|
HOSPIMED, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 8,995,521 |
|
BUILDER CONSTRUCTIONS s.r.o. |
1 | 7,544,265 |
|
TOTAL SERVICE a.s. |
1 | 7,440,000 |
|
LIFTMONT CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 7,357,000 |
|
Dateco, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,950,375 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
3 | 6,928,778 |
|
Tost.cz, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,330,000 |
|
MAP s.r.o. |
1 | 5,849,801 |
|
Abacus Electric, s.r.o. |
2 | 5,418,360 |
|
SoftwareONE Czech Republic s.r.o. |
1 | 5,044,734 |
|
MANABAU s.r.o. |
1 | 4,984,266 |
|
RENEX s.r.o. |
1 | 4,895,322 |
|
RUMILTON, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,793,000 |
|
Vinohradská stavební, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,583,645 |
|
MARBES CONSULTING s.r.o. |
1 | 4,419,750 |
|
REAL plus ENERGY s.r.o. |
1 | 3,739,841 |
|
VIRCO s.r.o. |
1 | 3,598,412 |
|
raz dva servis s.r.o. |
1 | 3,584,139 |
|
ABY servis, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,489,034 |
|
HELFI s.r.o. |
1 | 3,400,000 |
|
JOVIS STAVBY s.r.o. |
1 | 3,303,960 |
|
BELSTAV CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,586,580 |
|
Pražská energetika, a.s. |
1 | 2,551,200 |
|
Austur |
1 | 2,000,000 |
|
Roll Bohemia, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,994,400 |
|
CONEP s.r.o. |
1 | 1,961,926 |
|
AUSTIS stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 1,680,000 |
|
Ing. Filip Nehonský |
1 | 1,440,000 |
|
B.U.V., spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,305,000 |
|
PROLEMAX s.r.o. |
1 | 1,285,089 |
|
UNIVERSAL PRO s.r.o. |
1 | 1,182,600 |
|
KARGEA s.r.o. |
1 | 989,860 |
|
Com-Sys TRADE spol.s r.o. |
1 | 776,290 |
|
EQUITA Consulting s.r.o. |
1 | 712,000 |
|
Workout Europe s.r.o. |
1 | 684,130 |
|
PUDIS a.s. |
1 | 592,000 |
|
Architecture invest s.r.o. |
2 | 517,156 |
|
Arrastrar s.r.o. |
1 | 479,158 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Nonprice competition | 28% (17 from 60) |
| Division into lots | 8% (5 from 60) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 60) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 60) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 8% |
| Cancelled contracts | 32% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.72 |
| Average decision length | 152.10 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 62) |
| Contract | Type of discrepancy |
|---|---|
| Podpora a údržba infrastrukturních ICT systémů | Missing supplier ID |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 86% (zakázek z 56 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.66 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 56 tenders under the law) |
|
