Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Krajské ředitelství policie Jihomoravského kraje

IČO 75151499

The competition for contracts is low. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_FALSE_2

25.
ranking
72%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

20%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Bezhotovostní odběr pohonných hmot u čerpacích stanic formou karet
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Nákup originálních náhradních dílů pro vozidla Škoda a Volkswagen/Audi - Nákup originálních náhradních dílů pro vozidla Škoda
Parts and accessories for vehicles and their engines
1
Ø1 in industry
KŘP JmK - Dálniční oddělení PČR Chrlice - výstavba objektu
Houses construction work
5
Ø5 in industry
Dodávky osobních silničních vozidel v komerčním provedení - část A
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
KŘP JmK - Modernizace výcvikového střediska OSH Brno - Medlánky
Engineering works and construction works
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ŠKODA AUTO a.s.
11 157,559,042
ČEPRO, a.s.
3 84,273,760
VAŠSTAV, s.r.o.
4 77,089,759
PSK Group, spol. s r.o.
2 62,563,251
První KEY-STAV, a.s.
1 26,358,786
Other suppliers 352 390,030,113

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

25%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 15% (3 from 20)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 404,686,194
Small scale tenders 598,725,116
Unregulated purchases 1,200,040,488
Total 2,203,451,798

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
KŘP JmK Dálniční oddělení Podivín - výstavba objektu
Contract modification
26,358,786 4,336,983 (+17%)
Areál KŘP JmK Modřice, modernizace pracoviště MPI
Contract modification
23,820,000 2,948,495 (+13%)
KŘP JmK - Dálniční oddělení PČR Chrlice - výstavba objektu
Contract modification
44,000,142 1,189,655 (+3%)
„Realizace úspor energie - objekty KŘP JMK – ÚO Hodonín„
Contract modification
14,599,847 67,090 (+1%)
Realizace úspor energie - zpracování podkladů pro podání projektové žádosti v OPŽP 2014+
Contract modification
873,500 40,050 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17
Average decision length 38.17 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

85%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (zakázek z 17 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 66 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 53 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 77 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 101 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

60%
average 75%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.