Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Národní hřebčín Kladruby nad Labem

IČO 72048972

Good buyer. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2 Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

6.
ranking
78%
Zindex
Show average values  
61%
Bidder participation
90%
Winner concentration
23%
Pro-competitive tools
83%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
90%
Competitive contracting
73%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
84%
Buyer profile data quality
100%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Stavební obnova areálu výcvikového střediska Národního hřebčína Kladruby nad Labem v Heřmanově Městci
Buildings of particular historical or architectural interest
3
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy v areálu „Borek“
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce zařízení pro výcvik koní
Construction work for sports facilities
7
Ø2 in industry
Rámcová dohoda na dodávky pohonných hmot do vlastních úložišť
Diesel fuel
0
Ø2 in industry
Parkoviště v areálu Národního hřebčína Kladruby nad Labem
Parking lot construction work
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVERS, spol. s r.o.
 1 66,745,333
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
 3 58,355,048
EKOSTAVBY JABŮREK s. r. o.
 2 22,118,930
TANNACO, a.s.
 3 15,168,421
SBEKO, S.R.O.
 1 7,698,215
Other suppliers 114 118,689,129

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

23%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (2 from 26)
Nonprice competition 15% (4 from 26)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 26)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 207,552,843
Small scale tenders 85,627,258
Unregulated purchases 135,495,611
Total 428,675,712

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební obnova areálu výcvikového střediska Národního hřebčína Kladruby nad Labem v Heřmanově Městci
Contract modification 		66,745,333 4,936,136 (+8%)
Obnova stáje Paddock
Contract modification 		8,999,054 695,378 (+8%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.30
Average decision length 49.95 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

84%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 26 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 26 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 17 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 36 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 31 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 21 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.