Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Městský soud v Praze

IČO 00215660

SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2 Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

28.
ranking
71%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
MS Praha – navýšení kapacity, SLEZSKÁ – STAVBA
Construction work for buildings relating to law and order or emergency services
2
Ø4 in industry
MS Praha – dislokace OS Praha 5, HYBERNSKÁ - STAVBA
Construction work for buildings relating to law and order or emergency services
4
Ø4 in industry
MS Praha – modernizace CSMS II. fáze
Miscellaneous business-related services
1
Ø2 in industry
MS Praha - nástavba dvorního traktu, Spálená - STAVBA
Construction work for buildings relating to law and order or emergency services
5
Ø4 in industry
MS Praha_REKO technologických sítí – STAVBA
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS Praha a.s.
2 72,945,934
Auböck s.r.o.
1 44,536,849
ProLIST, s.r.o.
1 26,995,750
TREPART s.r.o.
1 21,685,485
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
2 17,333,329
Other suppliers 113 66,917,901

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

48%
average 31%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 214,182,216
Small scale tenders 144,539,598
Unregulated purchases 1,261,951,972
Total 1,620,673,786

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

64%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
MS Praha - nástavba dvorního traktu, Spálená - STAVBA
Contract modification
25,950,410 6,633,627 (+26%)
MS Praha – dislokace OS Praha 5, HYBERNSKÁ - STAVBA
Contract modification
44,536,849 6,603,788 (+15%)
MS Praha – navýšení kapacity, SLEZSKÁ – STAVBA
Contract modification
46,995,524 4,687,863 (+10%)
MS Praha_REKO technologických sítí – STAVBA
Contract modification
21,685,485 1,651,093 (+8%)
MS Praha – ostraha areálu CSMS Hostivice
Contract modification
4,671,360 327,229 (+8%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.23
Average decision length 58.62 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

80%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 84% (zakázek z 19 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 55 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 20 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 13 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 16 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.